Gaming’s hidden gamble: are we betting more than we realise?

The integration of gambling-like features in modern gaming blurs the line between gaming and gambling. Rapidly evolving monetisation strategies in games, especially microtransactions like loot boxes, exploit psychological reward processes similar to gambling disorder. These include variable ratio schedules, positively reinforced wins, and near-miss effects, among others. Such mechanisms encourage impulsive spending, prolonged engagement, and the development of problematic habits. The risks involved are especially concerning for younger players and individuals with comorbid mental health disorders, who may be more vulnerable to these features. Despite these clear parallels with gambling, regulatory frameworks often fail to address the overlap, leaving consumers exposed to financial and psychological harm. This editorial highlights the urgent need for an updated gambling definition in the context of gaming, increased transparency in game design, stricter age restrictions, and stronger regulatory oversight to safeguard player well-being as the industry continues to expand.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Irish Journal of Psychological Medicine
Published
2025-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/ipm.2025.10130
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Gambling Behavior and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.61
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gaming’s hidden gamble: are we betting more than we realise?

Carlos Sánchez Belmar, N. Subramanian
2 citations
Irish Journal of Psychological Medicine
Gambling Behavior and Treatments
4.61
article

Gaming’s hidden gamble: are we betting more than we realise?

Carlos Sánchez Belmar, N. Subramanian
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The integration of gambling-like features in modern gaming blurs the line between gaming and gambling. Rapidly evolving monetisation strategies in games, especially microtransactions like loot boxes, exploit psychological reward processes similar to gambling disorder. These include variable ratio schedules, positively reinforced wins, and near-miss effects, among others. Such mechanisms encourage impulsive spending, prolonged engagement, and the development of problematic habits. The risks involved are especially concerning for younger players and individuals with comorbid mental health disorders, who may be more vulnerable to these features. Despite these clear parallels with gambling, regulatory frameworks often fail to address the overlap, leaving consumers exposed to financial and psychological harm. This editorial highlights the urgent need for an updated gambling definition in the context of gaming, increased transparency in game design, stricter age restrictions, and stronger regulatory oversight to safeguard player well-being as the industry continues to expand.

Irish Journal of Psychological Medicine
Health Service Executive (IE), Avenue Day Hospital (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Gambling Behavior and Treatments
4.61
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.