Breed-Specific Anaesthetic Mortality in Dogs: Evidence from an Analysis of 55,019 Cases

Anaesthesia in dogs carries measurable risk, and whether this varies by breed is uncertain. We analysed a prospective, multicentre cohort of 55,019 canine anaesthetic procedures from premedication to 48 h post-extubation; after excluding euthanasias and non-anaesthetic deaths, 54,542 anaesthetics remained. Mixed-breed dogs served as the benchmark. Unadjusted mortality by breed, Fédération Cynologique Internationale (FCI) groups and sections used Wilson 95% CIs and χ<sup>2</sup>/Fisher tests; robust Poisson models adjusted for ASA status. Overall mortality was 0.69% (378/54,542; 95% CI 0.62-0.76), with mixed-breed dogs at 0.68% (109/16,129). Unadjusted rates were higher for German Shepherd Dog (1.46%), Chihuahua (1.35%) and Bulldog (1.26%); no FCI group differed, while the Chihuahueno section was higher. Brachycephalic dogs showed higher crude mortality than non-brachycephalics (0.82% vs. 0.65%), but this attenuated with ASA adjustment (RR 1.19, 95% CI 0.96-1.47). MDR1-associated breeds did not differ in crude or adjusted analyses (adjusted RR, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.61-2.14). After ASA adjustment, excess risk persisted for Chihuahua (RR 1.80, 95% CI 1.08-2.99) and Spanish Water Dog (RR 2.72, 95% CI 1.23-6.01), but not for German Shepherd Dog or Bulldog. Anaesthetic mortality was low overall; between-breed differences largely reflected case severity, supporting breed-aware, ASA-centred risk communication and further breed-specific research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Animals
Published
2025-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15213112
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.71
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Breed-Specific Anaesthetic Mortality in Dogs: Evidence from an Analysis of 55,019 Cases

Jaime Viscasillas, Pablo E. Otero, Fernando Martínez‐Taboada, José Ignacio Redondo et al.
2 citations
Animals
Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia
4.71
article

Breed-Specific Anaesthetic Mortality in Dogs: Evidence from an Analysis of 55,019 Cases

Jaime Viscasillas, Pablo E. Otero, Fernando Martínez‐Taboada, José Ignacio Redondo, Luis Ballester, Eva Zoe Hernández-Magaña
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Anaesthesia in dogs carries measurable risk, and whether this varies by breed is uncertain. We analysed a prospective, multicentre cohort of 55,019 canine anaesthetic procedures from premedication to 48 h post-extubation; after excluding euthanasias and non-anaesthetic deaths, 54,542 anaesthetics remained. Mixed-breed dogs served as the benchmark. Unadjusted mortality by breed, Fédération Cynologique Internationale (FCI) groups and sections used Wilson 95% CIs and χ<sup>2</sup>/Fisher tests; robust Poisson models adjusted for ASA status. Overall mortality was 0.69% (378/54,542; 95% CI 0.62-0.76), with mixed-breed dogs at 0.68% (109/16,129). Unadjusted rates were higher for German Shepherd Dog (1.46%), Chihuahua (1.35%) and Bulldog (1.26%); no FCI group differed, while the Chihuahueno section was higher. Brachycephalic dogs showed higher crude mortality than non-brachycephalics (0.82% vs. 0.65%), but this attenuated with ASA adjustment (RR 1.19, 95% CI 0.96-1.47). MDR1-associated breeds did not differ in crude or adjusted analyses (adjusted RR, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.61-2.14). After ASA adjustment, excess risk persisted for Chihuahua (RR 1.80, 95% CI 1.08-2.99) and Spanish Water Dog (RR 2.72, 95% CI 1.23-6.01), but not for German Shepherd Dog or Bulldog. Anaesthetic mortality was low overall; between-breed differences largely reflected case severity, supporting breed-aware, ASA-centred risk communication and further breed-specific research.

AnimalsVol. 15(21)
The University of Sydney (AU), Universidad de Buenos Aires (AR), Universidad Cardenal Herrera CEU (ES), Menescalia Centro Veterinario (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia
4.71
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.