Using markerless motion capture to <i>explore changes in</i> tackle kinematics and load-based tackling technique proficiency

The purpose of this study is to explore how PlayerLoad<sup>TM</sup> and tackle kinematics change during a simulated tackle in relation to tackle technique proficiency. Twenty amateur male rugby union players performed 12 tackles on a tackle contact simulator while wearing a microtechnology device. Each tackle was video-recorded and analysed using tackler proficiency criteria. Based on the criteria tackles were split into three categories: lower (≤7 AU), medium (8 AU) and higher scoring tackles (≥9AU). Markerless motion capture was used to derive kinematic variables for each tackle. Kinematic data and PlayerLoad<sup>TM</sup> variables were analysed between the three different categories. Power of the shoulder at contact in the higher scoring tackles (27.8 [95%Cl: 11.36-44.3]kW) was significantly higher than in the lower scoring tackles (7.9 [5.3-10.5]kW). Force of the shoulder at contact was higher in the lower technique scoring tackles (3.6 [2.6-4.5]kN) than in higher scoring tackles (-2.1 [-0.8-5.1]kN), but in the opposite direction to where the tackle is made. Technically proficient tackles are more powerful because players are applying their force correctly at the point of contact. Despite the higher technical proficiency group being more powerful, the external loads experienced by the player may be similar for all tackles.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Sports Sciences
Published
2025-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2025.2577028
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Using markerless motion capture to explore changes in tackle kinematics and load-based tackling technique proficiency

Zita Martins, Lara Paul, Amir Patel, Demi Davidow et al.
Journal of Sports Sciences
Sports Performance and Training
article

Using markerless motion capture to explore changes in tackle kinematics and load-based tackling technique proficiency

Zita Martins, Lara Paul, Amir Patel, Demi Davidow, Sarah Whitehead, Sharief Hendricks, Ben Jones, Gordon Rennie
article en

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to explore how PlayerLoad<sup>TM</sup> and tackle kinematics change during a simulated tackle in relation to tackle technique proficiency. Twenty amateur male rugby union players performed 12 tackles on a tackle contact simulator while wearing a microtechnology device. Each tackle was video-recorded and analysed using tackler proficiency criteria. Based on the criteria tackles were split into three categories: lower (≤7 AU), medium (8 AU) and higher scoring tackles (≥9AU). Markerless motion capture was used to derive kinematic variables for each tackle. Kinematic data and PlayerLoad<sup>TM</sup> variables were analysed between the three different categories. Power of the shoulder at contact in the higher scoring tackles (27.8 [95%Cl: 11.36-44.3]kW) was significantly higher than in the lower scoring tackles (7.9 [5.3-10.5]kW). Force of the shoulder at contact was higher in the lower technique scoring tackles (3.6 [2.6-4.5]kN) than in higher scoring tackles (-2.1 [-0.8-5.1]kN), but in the opposite direction to where the tackle is made. Technically proficient tackles are more powerful because players are applying their force correctly at the point of contact. Despite the higher technical proficiency group being more powerful, the external loads experienced by the player may be similar for all tackles.

Journal of Sports Sciences
University of Cape Town (ZA), The Football Association (GB), Australian Football League (AU), Sports Medicine Australia (AU), Catapult (US), Leeds Beckett University (GB), University of New England (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Sports Performance and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.