Performance Comparison of the Prediction Models for Enteric Methane Emissions from Dairy Cattle

The enteric methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) emission from dairy cattle is a significant factor contributing to anthropogenic climate change and the energy loss of animals. The objective of this study was to evaluate the prediction accuracy of the existing CH<sub>4</sub> estimation models from dairy cattle, and to identify the most reliable model for quantifying CH<sub>4</sub> emission. A database was compiled from 135 treatment means obtained from 81 peer-reviewed literatures, which included data on dietary composition, energy intake, and enteric CH<sub>4</sub> emission from dairy cattle. Forty existing dairy cattle prediction models were evaluated using this dataset based on the root mean square prediction error (RMSPE), concordance correlation coefficient (CCC), the ratio of RMSPE to standard deviation (RSR), and error decomposition indicators (ECT, ER, and ED). Results indicated that the RSR of model 38 was the lowest (0.71) but there were large prediction errors. Considering all evaluation indicators, model 21, which included dry matter intake (DMI), demonstrated the most robust predictive performance (RSR = 0.83, RMSPE = 14.41%, ECT = 3.42%, ER = 0.74%, ED = 96.75%, CCC = 0.58). Therefore, it is recommended for estimating enteric CH<sub>4</sub> emissions from dairy cattle. Future research will need to further improve the accuracy and robustness of enteric CH<sub>4</sub> prediction models by establishing a more comprehensive large-scale database, and expand the applicability of the model in various dairy farming systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Veterinary Sciences
Published
2025-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci12111036
Primary Topic
Agriculture, Soil, Plant Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Performance Comparison of the Prediction Models for Enteric Methane Emissions from Dairy Cattle

Yanhua Ren, Ruilan Dong, Mengdi Song, Zhenghui Li
Veterinary Sciences
Agriculture, Soil, Plant Science
article

Performance Comparison of the Prediction Models for Enteric Methane Emissions from Dairy Cattle

Yanhua Ren, Ruilan Dong, Mengdi Song, Zhenghui Li
article en

Abstract

The enteric methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) emission from dairy cattle is a significant factor contributing to anthropogenic climate change and the energy loss of animals. The objective of this study was to evaluate the prediction accuracy of the existing CH<sub>4</sub> estimation models from dairy cattle, and to identify the most reliable model for quantifying CH<sub>4</sub> emission. A database was compiled from 135 treatment means obtained from 81 peer-reviewed literatures, which included data on dietary composition, energy intake, and enteric CH<sub>4</sub> emission from dairy cattle. Forty existing dairy cattle prediction models were evaluated using this dataset based on the root mean square prediction error (RMSPE), concordance correlation coefficient (CCC), the ratio of RMSPE to standard deviation (RSR), and error decomposition indicators (ECT, ER, and ED). Results indicated that the RSR of model 38 was the lowest (0.71) but there were large prediction errors. Considering all evaluation indicators, model 21, which included dry matter intake (DMI), demonstrated the most robust predictive performance (RSR = 0.83, RMSPE = 14.41%, ECT = 3.42%, ER = 0.74%, ED = 96.75%, CCC = 0.58). Therefore, it is recommended for estimating enteric CH<sub>4</sub> emissions from dairy cattle. Future research will need to further improve the accuracy and robustness of enteric CH<sub>4</sub> prediction models by establishing a more comprehensive large-scale database, and expand the applicability of the model in various dairy farming systems.

Veterinary SciencesVol. 12(11)
Qingdao Agricultural University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Agriculture, Soil, Plant Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.