Investigation into the Working Behavior of Geotextile Pipe-Bag Systems on Soft Soil Foundations in the Ningde Port Industrial Zone, China

With the rapid development of coastal and nearshore engineering projects in China, geotextile pipe and bag (GPB) structures have been increasingly applied in marine land reclamation and coastal protection works. To better understand the mechanical behavior of GPB structures on soft soil foundations, this study conducts a systematic investigation into the mechanical properties of both soft soils and GPBs using a physical model test system. By integrating numerical simulations, the stress–deformation characteristics of GPB structures on soft soils and the evolution of pore pressure are further analyzed. The results indicate that the compression curve of soft soil exhibits significant nonlinearity, with silt showing higher apparent compressibility than silty clay. Experimental data yielded the compression coefficient λ and rebound coefficient μ for both soil types. As consolidation pressure increases, deviatoric stress in the soft soil rises notably, demonstrating typical strain-hardening behavior. Based on these findings, the critical state effective stress ratio M was determined for both soil types. The study also establishes the development laws of cohesion c and friction angle φ during soil consolidation, as well as the variation of pore water pressure under different confining pressures. Interface tests clarify the relationships between cohesion and friction angle at the interfaces between geotextile pipe bags and sand, and between adjacent pipe bag layers. Numerical simulations reveal that the reclamation construction process significantly influences structural horizontal displacement. Significant stress concentration occurs at the toe of the slope, while the central portion of the pipe-bag structure experiences maximum tensile stress—still within the material’s allowable stress limit. The installation of drainage boards effectively accelerates pore pressure dissipation, achieving nearly complete consolidation within one year after construction. This research provides a scientific foundation and practical engineering guidance for assessing the overall stability and safety of (GPB) structures on soft soil foundations in coastal regions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Water
Published
2025-10-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/w17213063
Primary Topic
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Investigation into the Working Behavior of Geotextile Pipe-Bag Systems on Soft Soil Foundations in the Ningde Port Industrial Zone, China

Xiatao Zhang, Wei Li, Wanli Guo, Honglei Ren et al.
Water
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
article

Investigation into the Working Behavior of Geotextile Pipe-Bag Systems on Soft Soil Foundations in the Ningde Port Industrial Zone, China

Xiatao Zhang, Wei Li, Wanli Guo, Honglei Ren, Peng Fan
article en

Abstract

With the rapid development of coastal and nearshore engineering projects in China, geotextile pipe and bag (GPB) structures have been increasingly applied in marine land reclamation and coastal protection works. To better understand the mechanical behavior of GPB structures on soft soil foundations, this study conducts a systematic investigation into the mechanical properties of both soft soils and GPBs using a physical model test system. By integrating numerical simulations, the stress–deformation characteristics of GPB structures on soft soils and the evolution of pore pressure are further analyzed. The results indicate that the compression curve of soft soil exhibits significant nonlinearity, with silt showing higher apparent compressibility than silty clay. Experimental data yielded the compression coefficient λ and rebound coefficient μ for both soil types. As consolidation pressure increases, deviatoric stress in the soft soil rises notably, demonstrating typical strain-hardening behavior. Based on these findings, the critical state effective stress ratio M was determined for both soil types. The study also establishes the development laws of cohesion c and friction angle φ during soil consolidation, as well as the variation of pore water pressure under different confining pressures. Interface tests clarify the relationships between cohesion and friction angle at the interfaces between geotextile pipe bags and sand, and between adjacent pipe bag layers. Numerical simulations reveal that the reclamation construction process significantly influences structural horizontal displacement. Significant stress concentration occurs at the toe of the slope, while the central portion of the pipe-bag structure experiences maximum tensile stress—still within the material’s allowable stress limit. The installation of drainage boards effectively accelerates pore pressure dissipation, achieving nearly complete consolidation within one year after construction. This research provides a scientific foundation and practical engineering guidance for assessing the overall stability and safety of (GPB) structures on soft soil foundations in coastal regions.

WaterVol. 17(21)
Nanjing Hydraulic Research Institute (CN), China Power Engineering Consulting Group (China) (CN), Shandong Electric Power Engineering Consulting Institute Corp (CN)
Ministry of Water Resources
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.