Usages of ‘soft’ EU labour law: the implementation of the Minimum Wage Directive

Transposition of the much-debated EU Directive on adequate minimum wages, adopted in October 2022, was due by November 2024. This article examines how the Minimum Wage Directive has (re-)shaped minimum wage and industrial relations policies in Bulgaria, Ireland, Italy and the Netherlands in the period immediately after its adoption. Distinguishing between different ‘usages’ of EU policy, I find that decision-makers and stakeholders have employed the Directive to reframe and reconceptualise questions of low pay and collective bargaining, and to raise political awareness of them and legitimate reforms previously considered to be unfeasible or inappropriate. At the same time, while the Advocate General’s opinion for annulment casts a shadow over the Directive’s future, its translation into meaningful regulatory and policy change (especially to promote collective bargaining) remains inextricably connected to – and dependent on – domestic political strategies and power relations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transfer European Review of Labour and Research
Published
2025-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10242589251384173
Primary Topic
European Union Policy and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Usages of ‘soft’ EU labour law: the implementation of the Minimum Wage Directive

Sven Schreurs
Transfer European Review of Labour and Research
European Union Policy and Governance
article

Usages of ‘soft’ EU labour law: the implementation of the Minimum Wage Directive

Sven Schreurs
article en

Abstract

Transposition of the much-debated EU Directive on adequate minimum wages, adopted in October 2022, was due by November 2024. This article examines how the Minimum Wage Directive has (re-)shaped minimum wage and industrial relations policies in Bulgaria, Ireland, Italy and the Netherlands in the period immediately after its adoption. Distinguishing between different ‘usages’ of EU policy, I find that decision-makers and stakeholders have employed the Directive to reframe and reconceptualise questions of low pay and collective bargaining, and to raise political awareness of them and legitimate reforms previously considered to be unfeasible or inappropriate. At the same time, while the Advocate General’s opinion for annulment casts a shadow over the Directive’s future, its translation into meaningful regulatory and policy change (especially to promote collective bargaining) remains inextricably connected to – and dependent on – domestic political strategies and power relations.

Transfer European Review of Labour and ResearchVol. 31(4)
Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
European Union Policy and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.