Kinematic and Kinetic Comparison of Sprint-Specific Exercises: Impact on Maximal Sprint Acceleration Training

Sprint-specific exercises (SSEs) are believed to train force, power and/or velocity qualities involved in the acceleration phase of sprinting. However, the kinetics and the kinematics of such exercises have never been explored. The aim of this study was to compare mechanical variables (horizontal and vertical forces, horizontal velocity of the centre of mass and the ratio of force) between SSEs and an all-out 40-m sprint acceleration (Sref). These variables were measured over each situation (Sref and 14 SSE) using six track-embedded force plates. The horizontal forces and velocities were either lower or equal to those of the Sref (SSE grand average deviation from FVP ~ -0.29 N∙kg<sup>-1</sup> for force; SSE grand average from Sref ~ -0.14 m∙s<sup>-1</sup> for velocity), while vertical force output was mostly greater in the SSE than the Sref (SSE mean deviation from Sref ~0.49 N∙kg<sup>-1</sup>). The ratio of force was lower or equal for the SSE compared to Sref. Despite large inter-individual variability, these SSEs seem useful to stimulate vertical force production, and not horizontal as hypothesised by coaches. These results suggest the importance of analysing the SSE used during training, from a force-velocity point of view, to better characterize their effectiveness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Human Kinetics
Published
2025-10-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5114/jhk/211899
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.72

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Kinematic and Kinetic Comparison of Sprint-Specific Exercises: Impact on Maximal Sprint Acceleration Training

Gaël Guilhem, Jean-Benoı̂t Morin, M. Benjamin, Charly Fornasier‐Santos et al.
1 citations
Journal of Human Kinetics
Sports Performance and Training
1.72
article

Kinematic and Kinetic Comparison of Sprint-Specific Exercises: Impact on Maximal Sprint Acceleration Training

Gaël Guilhem, Jean-Benoı̂t Morin, M. Benjamin, Charly Fornasier‐Santos, Jérémy Jusseaume, Slawinski Jean
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Sprint-specific exercises (SSEs) are believed to train force, power and/or velocity qualities involved in the acceleration phase of sprinting. However, the kinetics and the kinematics of such exercises have never been explored. The aim of this study was to compare mechanical variables (horizontal and vertical forces, horizontal velocity of the centre of mass and the ratio of force) between SSEs and an all-out 40-m sprint acceleration (Sref). These variables were measured over each situation (Sref and 14 SSE) using six track-embedded force plates. The horizontal forces and velocities were either lower or equal to those of the Sref (SSE grand average deviation from FVP ~ -0.29 N∙kg<sup>-1</sup> for force; SSE grand average from Sref ~ -0.14 m∙s<sup>-1</sup> for velocity), while vertical force output was mostly greater in the SSE than the Sref (SSE mean deviation from Sref ~0.49 N∙kg<sup>-1</sup>). The ratio of force was lower or equal for the SSE compared to Sref. Despite large inter-individual variability, these SSEs seem useful to stimulate vertical force production, and not horizontal as hypothesised by coaches. These results suggest the importance of analysing the SSE used during training, from a force-velocity point of view, to better characterize their effectiveness.

Journal of Human KineticsVol. 99
Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 (FR), Fédération française de cardiologie (FR), Laboratoire Interuniversitaire de Biologie de la Motricité (FR), Institut National du Sport, de l'Expertise et de la Performance (FR)
Agence Nationale de la Recherche, Fonds National de la Recherche Luxembourg
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Sports Performance and Training
1.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.