Gender heritage: The case of nonbinary households in the United States

Little is known about how non-binary genders shape the distribution of household labor: a space that remains largely segregated along the gender binary. This article presents qualitative findings from households where at least one romantic partner identifies as non-binary. Between 2023 and 2025, I combine 80 hours of longitudinal interview data and field notes from visits to 22 primarily-monogamous and white households to understand how nonbinary identity affects household labor. I argue that “gender heritage”—the experiences of binary socialization—exerts greater influence on relational practices, like housework, than gender identity. Specifically, AFAB partners in relationships with AMAB partners are more likely to take on the majority of cognitive labor in the maintenance of their household and relationship. I challenge the assumption that non-binary identities translate into interactions wherein one’s experience evades influence from assigned gender. Rather, it is binary gender heritage that strongly predicts the distribution of historically gendered household labor burdens.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Critical Sociology
Published
2025-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/08969205251381696
Primary Topic
Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gender heritage: The case of nonbinary households in the United States

Miranda P. Dotson
Critical Sociology
Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
article

Gender heritage: The case of nonbinary households in the United States

Miranda P. Dotson
article en

Abstract

Little is known about how non-binary genders shape the distribution of household labor: a space that remains largely segregated along the gender binary. This article presents qualitative findings from households where at least one romantic partner identifies as non-binary. Between 2023 and 2025, I combine 80 hours of longitudinal interview data and field notes from visits to 22 primarily-monogamous and white households to understand how nonbinary identity affects household labor. I argue that “gender heritage”—the experiences of binary socialization—exerts greater influence on relational practices, like housework, than gender identity. Specifically, AFAB partners in relationships with AMAB partners are more likely to take on the majority of cognitive labor in the maintenance of their household and relationship. I challenge the assumption that non-binary identities translate into interactions wherein one’s experience evades influence from assigned gender. Rather, it is binary gender heritage that strongly predicts the distribution of historically gendered household labor burdens.

Critical Sociology
Northeastern University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.