Correction: Quantifying loss aversion: Evidence from a UK population survey

We report and correct a coding error in the estimates of loss aversion in Blake et al. (2021, hereafter BCW) that were based on a representative sample of just over four thousand respondents to a survey in the United Kingdom.The original headline result was that the disutility of a loss of 500 was 2.41 times the utility of a gain of 500.The corrected result is a ratio of 1.80.In this correction, we explain briefly the error (full details of the model are in BCW).The estimates of loss aversion were based upon the iso-elastic form of the value function, namely:where x is the gain if positive and loss if negative.The parameter measures risk attitude in the domain of gains; similarly, the parameter measures risk attitude in

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Risk and Uncertainty
Published
2025-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11166-025-09472-8
Primary Topic
Healthcare Policy and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Correction: Quantifying loss aversion: Evidence from a UK population survey

Edmund Cannon, Douglas Wright, David Blake
Journal of Risk and Uncertainty
Healthcare Policy and Management
article

Correction: Quantifying loss aversion: Evidence from a UK population survey

Edmund Cannon, Douglas Wright, David Blake
article en

Abstract

We report and correct a coding error in the estimates of loss aversion in Blake et al. (2021, hereafter BCW) that were based on a representative sample of just over four thousand respondents to a survey in the United Kingdom.The original headline result was that the disutility of a loss of 500 was 2.41 times the utility of a gain of 500.The corrected result is a ratio of 1.80.In this correction, we explain briefly the error (full details of the model are in BCW).The estimates of loss aversion were based upon the iso-elastic form of the value function, namely:where x is the gain if positive and loss if negative.The parameter measures risk attitude in the domain of gains; similarly, the parameter measures risk attitude in

Journal of Risk and UncertaintyVol. 71(3)
City, University of London (GB), University of Bristol (GB), The Priory Hospital (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Healthcare Policy and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Correction: Quantifying loss aversion: Evidence from a UK population survey — Edmund Cannon, Douglas Wright, et al. · Journal of Risk and Uncertainty (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS