Correction: Quantifying loss aversion: Evidence from a UK population survey
We report and correct a coding error in the estimates of loss aversion in Blake et al. (2021, hereafter BCW) that were based on a representative sample of just over four thousand respondents to a survey in the United Kingdom.The original headline result was that the disutility of a loss of 500 was 2.41 times the utility of a gain of 500.The corrected result is a ratio of 1.80.In this correction, we explain briefly the error (full details of the model are in BCW).The estimates of loss aversion were based upon the iso-elastic form of the value function, namely:where x is the gain if positive and loss if negative.The parameter measures risk attitude in the domain of gains; similarly, the parameter measures risk attitude in
Authors
- Edmund Cannon (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1947-8499)
- Douglas Wright (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6810-7782)
- David Blake (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2453-2090)
Institutions
- City, University of London (GB)
- University of Bristol (GB)
- The Priory Hospital (GB)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Risk and Uncertainty
- Published
- 2025-10-27
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s11166-025-09472-8
- Primary Topic
- Healthcare Policy and Management
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00