Impact on Visual Arts & Cultural Expressions: Motifs & Symbolic Significance of the Colonial Building in Delhi

This paper examines the Indo-Saracenic architectural style, specifically as utilised by Sir Edwin Lutyens in the development of New Delhi (1912–1931), to elucidate its role as a deliberate political and symbolic instrument for asserting British imperial supremacy and establishing a visual assertion of historical Indian authority. The research investigates how the architecture, exemplified by the Viceroy's House (Rashtrapati Bhavan), established a manifestation of "hegemonic hybridity". The primary argument claims that Lutyens' design was fundamentally a Western classical structure, with indigenous features—specifically the chhajja, chhatri, and jali—integrated mostly as "superficial ornamentation" or "political concession". This method systematically removed the intricate cultural significances of native aspects, reinterpreting them as generic "Indian touches" to disguise a claim of logical, Western authority. The outcome was an aesthetic domination, characterised by a European structural framework complemented by Indian artistic adornment. Additionally, significant elements such as the Jaipur Column conveyed a distinct sense of "narrative subjugation" within the imperial environment.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25oct821
Primary Topic
Architecture and Cultural Influences
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact on Visual Arts & Cultural Expressions: Motifs & Symbolic Significance of the Colonial Building in Delhi

Rupali Mandal, Moumita Sarker Moon
Architecture and Cultural Influences
article

Impact on Visual Arts & Cultural Expressions: Motifs & Symbolic Significance of the Colonial Building in Delhi

Rupali Mandal, Moumita Sarker Moon
article en

Abstract

This paper examines the Indo-Saracenic architectural style, specifically as utilised by Sir Edwin Lutyens in the development of New Delhi (1912–1931), to elucidate its role as a deliberate political and symbolic instrument for asserting British imperial supremacy and establishing a visual assertion of historical Indian authority. The research investigates how the architecture, exemplified by the Viceroy's House (Rashtrapati Bhavan), established a manifestation of "hegemonic hybridity". The primary argument claims that Lutyens' design was fundamentally a Western classical structure, with indigenous features—specifically the chhajja, chhatri, and jali—integrated mostly as "superficial ornamentation" or "political concession". This method systematically removed the intricate cultural significances of native aspects, reinterpreting them as generic "Indian touches" to disguise a claim of logical, Western authority. The outcome was an aesthetic domination, characterised by a European structural framework complemented by Indian artistic adornment. Additionally, significant elements such as the Jaipur Column conveyed a distinct sense of "narrative subjugation" within the imperial environment.

Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Architecture and Cultural Influences
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.