43: Modified ECMO in pediatric and neonatal patients. A cost effective solution for post-cardiotomy shock management.

Introduction: Post-cardiotomy shock is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in pediatric and neonatal patients after cardiac surgery. This study investigates the use of modified cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) circuits as a cost-effective alternative to conventional ECMO systems for short-term support in managing post-cardiotomy shock. The aim of our research was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of converting conventional CPB circuits into closed ECMO systems for managing post-cardiotomy shock in pediatric and neonatal patients, while maintaining optimal clinical outcomes. Methods: We assessed the adaptation of CPB circuits into closed ECMO setups, using CPB oxygenators for temporary support. Cost savings, duration of ECMO support, complication rates, and patient outcomes where analyzed. Results: The modified CPB-ECMO strategy resulted in significantly lower costs without compromising clinical outcomes. Early ECMO initiation reduced support duration and complications, further contributing to cost savings. Conclusions: The conversion of CPB circuits into ECMO systems offers a cost-effective and efficient solution for managing post-cardiotomy shock in pediatric and neonatal patients, making ECMO more accessible in resource-limited settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ASAIO Journal
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mat.0001171468.99621.86
Primary Topic
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

43: Modified ECMO in pediatric and neonatal patients. A cost effective solution for post-cardiotomy shock management.

Tajender S. Vasu
ASAIO Journal
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
article

43: Modified ECMO in pediatric and neonatal patients. A cost effective solution for post-cardiotomy shock management.

Tajender S. Vasu
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Post-cardiotomy shock is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in pediatric and neonatal patients after cardiac surgery. This study investigates the use of modified cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) circuits as a cost-effective alternative to conventional ECMO systems for short-term support in managing post-cardiotomy shock. The aim of our research was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of converting conventional CPB circuits into closed ECMO systems for managing post-cardiotomy shock in pediatric and neonatal patients, while maintaining optimal clinical outcomes. Methods: We assessed the adaptation of CPB circuits into closed ECMO setups, using CPB oxygenators for temporary support. Cost savings, duration of ECMO support, complication rates, and patient outcomes where analyzed. Results: The modified CPB-ECMO strategy resulted in significantly lower costs without compromising clinical outcomes. Early ECMO initiation reduced support duration and complications, further contributing to cost savings. Conclusions: The conversion of CPB circuits into ECMO systems offers a cost-effective and efficient solution for managing post-cardiotomy shock in pediatric and neonatal patients, making ECMO more accessible in resource-limited settings.

ASAIO JournalVol. 71(Supplement 6)
Prince Mohammed bin Abdulaziz Hospital (SA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

43: Modified ECMO in pediatric and neonatal patients. A cost effective solution for post-cardiotomy shock management. — Tajender S. Vasu · ASAIO Journal (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS