EEG Microstate Differences Between Alzheimer’s Disease, Frontotemporal Dementia, and Healthy Controls Using 4 and 7 Clustering Classes with a Ratio Approach

<i>Background and Objectives</i>: Alzheimer's disease (AD) and frontotemporal dementia (FTD) present overlapping clinical and neuroanatomical features, complicating early diagnosis. Therefore, this study evaluated whether EEG microstate analysis can provide reliable markers to distinguish patients with dementia from healthy controls. <i>Materials and Methods</i>: Resting-state EEG was recorded from 36 AD patients, 23 FTD patients, and 29 healthy controls. Preprocessing and microstate analysis were conducted using the MICROSTATELAB pipeline in EEGLAB. Clustering solutions ranging from four to seven classes were tested, with grand mean fitting and variance thresholds. Temporal parameters (duration, occurrence, and coverage) and their ratio-normalized forms were compared across groups using ANCOVA and nonparametric tests. Associations with Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores were assessed by regression analyses. <i>Results</i>: The four- and seven-class clustering solutions achieved high variance overlap with published microstate templates. In the four-class solution, temporal parameters of microstates B and D significantly differentiated controls from dementia groups, while in the seven-class solution, microstates C and G were the most informative. Ratio-normalized parameters improved group discrimination and were associated with MMSE scores. <i>Conclusions</i>: EEG microstates capture disease-related alterations in large-scale brain dynamics that differentiate patients with dementia from healthy individuals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicina
Published
2025-10-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61111917
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.47
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

EEG Microstate Differences Between Alzheimer’s Disease, Frontotemporal Dementia, and Healthy Controls Using 4 and 7 Clustering Classes with a Ratio Approach

Jinwon Chang
1 citations
Medicina
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
1.47
article

EEG Microstate Differences Between Alzheimer’s Disease, Frontotemporal Dementia, and Healthy Controls Using 4 and 7 Clustering Classes with a Ratio Approach

Jinwon Chang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<i>Background and Objectives</i>: Alzheimer's disease (AD) and frontotemporal dementia (FTD) present overlapping clinical and neuroanatomical features, complicating early diagnosis. Therefore, this study evaluated whether EEG microstate analysis can provide reliable markers to distinguish patients with dementia from healthy controls. <i>Materials and Methods</i>: Resting-state EEG was recorded from 36 AD patients, 23 FTD patients, and 29 healthy controls. Preprocessing and microstate analysis were conducted using the MICROSTATELAB pipeline in EEGLAB. Clustering solutions ranging from four to seven classes were tested, with grand mean fitting and variance thresholds. Temporal parameters (duration, occurrence, and coverage) and their ratio-normalized forms were compared across groups using ANCOVA and nonparametric tests. Associations with Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores were assessed by regression analyses. <i>Results</i>: The four- and seven-class clustering solutions achieved high variance overlap with published microstate templates. In the four-class solution, temporal parameters of microstates B and D significantly differentiated controls from dementia groups, while in the seven-class solution, microstates C and G were the most informative. Ratio-normalized parameters improved group discrimination and were associated with MMSE scores. <i>Conclusions</i>: EEG microstates capture disease-related alterations in large-scale brain dynamics that differentiate patients with dementia from healthy individuals.

MedicinaVol. 61(11)
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US), Harvard University (US), Williams College (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
1.47
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.