Covert Borderwork: Managing Borders and Migration through Secrecy

Abstract In this article, we analyse secretive practices of border and migration management we term covert borderwork . Covert borderwork comprises techniques of border and migration management which adopt varying forms and temporalities of secrecy in their design, implementation, and/or performance. Through primary source documents and interviews, we detail and analyse the European Commission, EU member states, and the Australian government's use of fronts such as the UNHCR, the International Organization for Migration, and private firms, as well as the use of incentivised agents and unbranded materials to obscure or conceal their involvement in their own migration information campaigns. We describe and analyse secretive forms of direct engagement with potential migrants and their communities to spread anti‐migration sentiment in Africa and the Asia‐Pacific. We show this covert borderwork to be facilitated through various astroturfing techniques designed to obscure and conceal the involvement of states in these campaigns.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Antipode
Published
2025-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.70089
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Migration, Refugees, and Integration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Covert Borderwork: Managing Borders and Migration through Secrecy

Julia Van Dessel, Josh Watkins
1 citations
Antipode
Migration, Refugees, and Integration
4.20
article

Covert Borderwork: Managing Borders and Migration through Secrecy

Julia Van Dessel, Josh Watkins
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract In this article, we analyse secretive practices of border and migration management we term covert borderwork . Covert borderwork comprises techniques of border and migration management which adopt varying forms and temporalities of secrecy in their design, implementation, and/or performance. Through primary source documents and interviews, we detail and analyse the European Commission, EU member states, and the Australian government's use of fronts such as the UNHCR, the International Organization for Migration, and private firms, as well as the use of incentivised agents and unbranded materials to obscure or conceal their involvement in their own migration information campaigns. We describe and analyse secretive forms of direct engagement with potential migrants and their communities to spread anti‐migration sentiment in Africa and the Asia‐Pacific. We show this covert borderwork to be facilitated through various astroturfing techniques designed to obscure and conceal the involvement of states in these campaigns.

AntipodeVol. 58(2)
National University of Singapore (SG), University of Oxford (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Migration, Refugees, and Integration
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.