A Simple Method Using High Matric Suction Calibration Points to Optimize Soil–Water Characteristic Curves Derived from the Centrifuge Method

The centrifuge method serves as an efficient and rapid approach for determining the soil–water characteristic curve (SWCC). However, soil shrinkage during centrifugation remains overlooked and prior modified methods may suffer from complex operations, high costs, time consumption, and limited applicability. To address these issues, this study introduces a simple correction scheme (G3) for determining drying SWCCs using the centrifuge method based on high matric suction calibration points. The performance of the proposed G3 method was systematically evaluated against a modified method considering soil shrinkage (G1) and the conventional uncorrected method (G2). Results revealed significant soil linear shrinkage post-centrifugation, accompanied by a reduction in total soil porosity and an increase in soil bulk density. SWCCs from all methods exhibited strong consistency at low matric suction ranges but diverged markedly at high matric suction segments. High matric suction data dominated the SWCC fitting. The G1 method achieved the highest fitting accuracy, while the G3 method performed the worst yet maintained acceptable reliability. The G2 method yielded optimal SWCC for simulating saturated soil water content, field capacity, and permanent wilting point. Conversely, Hydrus-1D simulations revealed superior performance of the G3 method in simulating farmland soil moisture dynamics during the dehumidification process. Values of R2 across methods followed G3 > G1 > G2, while mean absolute error, mean absolute percentage error, and root mean square error exhibited the opposite trend. These findings highlight that the previous modified approaches are more suitable for low and medium matric suction ranges. The proposed correction method enhances drying SWCC performance across the full matric suction range, offering a practical refinement for the centrifuge method. This advancement could enhance the reliability in soil hydraulic characterization and contribute to a better understanding of the hydraulic–mechanical–chemical behavior in soils.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agriculture
Published
2025-10-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15212223
Primary Topic
Soil and Unsaturated Flow
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Simple Method Using High Matric Suction Calibration Points to Optimize Soil–Water Characteristic Curves Derived from the Centrifuge Method

Hongyi Pan, Yue Tian, Xiaoyan Jiao, Bo Li
Agriculture
Soil and Unsaturated Flow
article

A Simple Method Using High Matric Suction Calibration Points to Optimize Soil–Water Characteristic Curves Derived from the Centrifuge Method

Hongyi Pan, Yue Tian, Xiaoyan Jiao, Bo Li
article en

Abstract

The centrifuge method serves as an efficient and rapid approach for determining the soil–water characteristic curve (SWCC). However, soil shrinkage during centrifugation remains overlooked and prior modified methods may suffer from complex operations, high costs, time consumption, and limited applicability. To address these issues, this study introduces a simple correction scheme (G3) for determining drying SWCCs using the centrifuge method based on high matric suction calibration points. The performance of the proposed G3 method was systematically evaluated against a modified method considering soil shrinkage (G1) and the conventional uncorrected method (G2). Results revealed significant soil linear shrinkage post-centrifugation, accompanied by a reduction in total soil porosity and an increase in soil bulk density. SWCCs from all methods exhibited strong consistency at low matric suction ranges but diverged markedly at high matric suction segments. High matric suction data dominated the SWCC fitting. The G1 method achieved the highest fitting accuracy, while the G3 method performed the worst yet maintained acceptable reliability. The G2 method yielded optimal SWCC for simulating saturated soil water content, field capacity, and permanent wilting point. Conversely, Hydrus-1D simulations revealed superior performance of the G3 method in simulating farmland soil moisture dynamics during the dehumidification process. Values of R2 across methods followed G3 > G1 > G2, while mean absolute error, mean absolute percentage error, and root mean square error exhibited the opposite trend. These findings highlight that the previous modified approaches are more suitable for low and medium matric suction ranges. The proposed correction method enhances drying SWCC performance across the full matric suction range, offering a practical refinement for the centrifuge method. This advancement could enhance the reliability in soil hydraulic characterization and contribute to a better understanding of the hydraulic–mechanical–chemical behavior in soils.

AgricultureVol. 15(21)
Shanxi Agricultural University (CN), Jinzhong University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Soil and Unsaturated Flow
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.