Understanding the Perceptions and Performance of Transtibial Prosthetic Covers: Perspectives and Preferences of Individuals With Lower Limb Absence, Prosthetists, and Technicians

ABSTRACT Background The aesthetics and function of transtibial prosthetic covers can impact the functional abilities and activities that people with lower limb absence participate in. However, little is documented about how these covers are perceived by both people with lower limb absence and the prosthetic clinicians and technicians who work with them. Objective This study aimed to address this gap by exploring the performance and perceptions of transtibial covers from the perspective of those with lower limb absence (users), and prosthetic clinicians and technicians (professionals). Study Design We used a mixed methods design consisting of generative design sessions and a survey. Methods Twelve users and six professionals participated in the generative design sessions that explored cover use, drivers of cover selection, and needs and wants in cover design. Surveys, completed by 26 professionals and 33 users, expanded on these findings by examining individuals’ satisfaction with covers, important characteristics of covers, and challenges with current cover designs. Results Findings highlight desired features, limitations, and unmet needs with existing cover designs. Users’ suggestions focused on enhanced durability, functionality, and aesthetics and included a desire for cover designs that could prioritize their personal narrative and adapt to their varied daily lives. Users had diverse opinions about whether they wanted their prosthesis to stand out as a unique expression of themselves or have it match their sound limb as much as possible. Professionals’ suggestions for covers related to production issues such as using more durable materials, decreasing fabrication time, and having designs that are easier to adjust or repair. Conclusions Insights can be used to improve prosthetic cover designs, ideally supporting users to tell the stories they want to tell, while streamlining clinical workflows. Clinical Relevance Statement By understanding the unmet needs of people who use transtibial prosthetic covers as well as the clinicians and technicians who supply them, we can better design transtibial covers that meet the demands of the people who will wear or provide them.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JPO Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics
Published
2025-10-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/jpo.0000000000000601
Primary Topic
Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding the Perceptions and Performance of Transtibial Prosthetic Covers: Perspectives and Preferences of Individuals With Lower Limb Absence, Prosthetists, and Technicians

Johanne Mattie, Murveena Jeawon, Shadi Sabeti, Brittany Mae Pousett et al.
JPO Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics
Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
article

Understanding the Perceptions and Performance of Transtibial Prosthetic Covers: Perspectives and Preferences of Individuals With Lower Limb Absence, Prosthetists, and Technicians

Johanne Mattie, Murveena Jeawon, Shadi Sabeti, Brittany Mae Pousett, Matthew T. Bennett, Jesse Spellen, Lisa Boulton, Jedidiah Chiusa, Eduardo Lejtman, Marta Kierkus
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background The aesthetics and function of transtibial prosthetic covers can impact the functional abilities and activities that people with lower limb absence participate in. However, little is documented about how these covers are perceived by both people with lower limb absence and the prosthetic clinicians and technicians who work with them. Objective This study aimed to address this gap by exploring the performance and perceptions of transtibial covers from the perspective of those with lower limb absence (users), and prosthetic clinicians and technicians (professionals). Study Design We used a mixed methods design consisting of generative design sessions and a survey. Methods Twelve users and six professionals participated in the generative design sessions that explored cover use, drivers of cover selection, and needs and wants in cover design. Surveys, completed by 26 professionals and 33 users, expanded on these findings by examining individuals’ satisfaction with covers, important characteristics of covers, and challenges with current cover designs. Results Findings highlight desired features, limitations, and unmet needs with existing cover designs. Users’ suggestions focused on enhanced durability, functionality, and aesthetics and included a desire for cover designs that could prioritize their personal narrative and adapt to their varied daily lives. Users had diverse opinions about whether they wanted their prosthesis to stand out as a unique expression of themselves or have it match their sound limb as much as possible. Professionals’ suggestions for covers related to production issues such as using more durable materials, decreasing fabrication time, and having designs that are easier to adjust or repair. Conclusions Insights can be used to improve prosthetic cover designs, ideally supporting users to tell the stories they want to tell, while streamlining clinical workflows. Clinical Relevance Statement By understanding the unmet needs of people who use transtibial prosthetic covers as well as the clinicians and technicians who supply them, we can better design transtibial covers that meet the demands of the people who will wear or provide them.

JPO Journal of Prosthetics and OrthoticsVol. 38(2)
University of British Columbia (CA), British Columbia Institute of Technology (CA), Universidad Iberoamericana (MX), European Respiratory Society (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.