The impact of recent approvals on future alzheimer’s disease clinical development: Statistical considerations for combination trials
Studies evaluating investigational therapies as add-on to mABs are complex, and their cost will depend on the interaction between treatments. An inescapable fact in add-on trials is the slower progression of the control arm; and it is difficult to further slow already slow progression. Treatments that are likely to work better with amyloid removal will be easier to study due to their complementary MOA. Symptomatic treatments may require fewer additional subjects than disease-modifying treatments since they are less affected by the presence or absence of mABs.
Authors
- Suzanne Hendrix (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2374-7727)
- Craig Mallinckrodt
- Aaron H. Burstein (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0008-0176-9184)
- Chenyu Zhang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0049-4234)
- Howard Fillit (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3509-6706)
- Samuel P. Dickson (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4622-1349)
- Laura Nisenbaum
Institutions
- Alzheimer's Drug Discovery Foundation (US)
- TetraLogic Pharmaceuticals (United States) (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer s Disease
- Published
- 2025-10-27
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjpad.2025.100391
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Genomics and Rare Diseases
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 1.82