Domestic abuse and financial remedies—making the case for a new approach

Abstract It is only in rare and ‘extreme’ cases that English family law takes account of domestic abuse as conduct that is relevant to the redistribution of assets on divorce. Recent family law reform debates and empirical research have exposed many of the challenges faced by victims–survivors, both in terms of securing a fair financial outcome following divorce and in navigating the family justice system. Recognizing the economic impact of abuse on the victim–survivor and adopting a relational autonomy lens, this article makes a case for a more responsive approach from the family justice system—one that acknowledges the importance of access to material resources to aid recovery from abuse. While it is recognized that there are inherent challenges involved in taking greater account of abuse when dividing assets, the article nonetheless concludes that the family justice system must change its approach if it is to fulfil its commitment to tackling domestic abuse and its impacts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Law Policy and the Family
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/lawfam/ebaf032
Primary Topic
Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Domestic abuse and financial remedies—making the case for a new approach

Ellen Gordon-Bouvier
International Journal of Law Policy and the Family
Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse
article

Domestic abuse and financial remedies—making the case for a new approach

Ellen Gordon-Bouvier
article en

Abstract

Abstract It is only in rare and ‘extreme’ cases that English family law takes account of domestic abuse as conduct that is relevant to the redistribution of assets on divorce. Recent family law reform debates and empirical research have exposed many of the challenges faced by victims–survivors, both in terms of securing a fair financial outcome following divorce and in navigating the family justice system. Recognizing the economic impact of abuse on the victim–survivor and adopting a relational autonomy lens, this article makes a case for a more responsive approach from the family justice system—one that acknowledges the importance of access to material resources to aid recovery from abuse. While it is recognized that there are inherent challenges involved in taking greater account of abuse when dividing assets, the article nonetheless concludes that the family justice system must change its approach if it is to fulfil its commitment to tackling domestic abuse and its impacts.

International Journal of Law Policy and the FamilyVol. 39(1)
University of Exeter (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.