How “Vulnerability” Manifests as an Interactional Asymmetry in Police Interviews with Adolescent Suspects and Intellectually Impaired Witnesses

Vulnerable suspects and witnesses who interact with the criminal justice system in England and Wales are entitled to legal affordances designed to protect them. We present novel evidence of how categorizations of vulnerability are (re)produced and negotiated to manage institutionally relevant matters during police interviews. We use conversation analysis to examine 30 police interviews with vulnerable suspects ( n = 10) and witnesses ( n = 20). Our findings challenge the notion of vulnerability as an internal and stable phenomenon, providing new insights into vulnerability in policing as an interactional concern that allows interlocutors to negotiate interactional asymmetry.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Symbolic Interaction
Published
2025-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/symb.70023
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
10.42
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How “Vulnerability” Manifests as an Interactional Asymmetry in Police Interviews with Adolescent Suspects and Intellectually Impaired Witnesses

Annina Heini, Emma Richardson, Laura Jenkins, Elizabeth Stokoe
1 citations
Symbolic Interaction
Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
10.42
article

How “Vulnerability” Manifests as an Interactional Asymmetry in Police Interviews with Adolescent Suspects and Intellectually Impaired Witnesses

Annina Heini, Emma Richardson, Laura Jenkins, Elizabeth Stokoe
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Vulnerable suspects and witnesses who interact with the criminal justice system in England and Wales are entitled to legal affordances designed to protect them. We present novel evidence of how categorizations of vulnerability are (re)produced and negotiated to manage institutionally relevant matters during police interviews. We use conversation analysis to examine 30 police interviews with vulnerable suspects ( n = 10) and witnesses ( n = 20). Our findings challenge the notion of vulnerability as an internal and stable phenomenon, providing new insights into vulnerability in policing as an interactional concern that allows interlocutors to negotiate interactional asymmetry.

Symbolic InteractionVol. 48(4)
Loughborough University (GB), Aston University (GB), London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
10.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.