Red meat vs. white meat: A comparative analysis of histological characteristics, nutritional profiles, and health implications

This review critically assesses the nutritional and health impacts of red versus white meat. Current evidence strongly associates red meat consumption (beef, pork, lamb) with increased risks of colorectal cancer, cardiovascular disease, and type 2 diabetes, primarily attributed to its high heme iron and saturated fat content. In contrast, white meat (poultry, seafood) demonstrates a more favorable risk profile and may be protective. By synthesizing the current biochemical evidence, this review highlights the contrasting health effects of both meat types. While red meat consumption is associated with increased health risks, moderate intake of white meat appears to offer a healthier alternative. Based on these findings, the review provides evidence-based dietary recommendations to inform consumer choices and help mitigate associated health risks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Food Chemistry X
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fochx.2025.103211
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Meat and Animal Product Quality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.19
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Red meat vs. white meat: A comparative analysis of histological characteristics, nutritional profiles, and health implications

Linyuan Shen, Hanbing Dan, Mailin Gan, Lei Chen et al.
1 citations
Food Chemistry X
Meat and Animal Product Quality
1.19
article

Red meat vs. white meat: A comparative analysis of histological characteristics, nutritional profiles, and health implications

Linyuan Shen, Hanbing Dan, Mailin Gan, Lei Chen, Ye Zhao, Lili Niu, Qihang Wu, Yan Wang, Li Zhu, Huiling Zhang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This review critically assesses the nutritional and health impacts of red versus white meat. Current evidence strongly associates red meat consumption (beef, pork, lamb) with increased risks of colorectal cancer, cardiovascular disease, and type 2 diabetes, primarily attributed to its high heme iron and saturated fat content. In contrast, white meat (poultry, seafood) demonstrates a more favorable risk profile and may be protective. By synthesizing the current biochemical evidence, this review highlights the contrasting health effects of both meat types. While red meat consumption is associated with increased health risks, moderate intake of white meat appears to offer a healthier alternative. Based on these findings, the review provides evidence-based dietary recommendations to inform consumer choices and help mitigate associated health risks.

Food Chemistry XVol. 31
Sichuan Agricultural University (CN), Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Meat and Animal Product Quality
1.19
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.