Europe and China’s Competing Ideas in the Belt and Road Initiative

China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) is more than an infrastructure project; it has become a discursive battleground where competing ideas about cooperation, benefit, and global order are contested. The article argues that China uses the BRI to exert ideational power, promoting political ideas such as ‘mutual benefit’ and a ‘new model of cooperation’ to shape political discourse to its advantage. The European Union (EU), relying on its normative power and universalist vocabulary, underestimates this ideational dimension and often misinterprets China’s political ideas. This imbalance shows how the EU risks losing discursive influence in an ongoing contest over meaning and agenda-setting.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of East Asia Security
Published
2025-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.53300/001c.146325
Primary Topic
Belt and Road Initiative
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Europe and China’s Competing Ideas in the Belt and Road Initiative

Stefanie Weil, Nan You, Hongyu Wang
Journal of East Asia Security
Belt and Road Initiative
article

Europe and China’s Competing Ideas in the Belt and Road Initiative

Stefanie Weil, Nan You, Hongyu Wang
article en

Abstract

China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) is more than an infrastructure project; it has become a discursive battleground where competing ideas about cooperation, benefit, and global order are contested. The article argues that China uses the BRI to exert ideational power, promoting political ideas such as ‘mutual benefit’ and a ‘new model of cooperation’ to shape political discourse to its advantage. The European Union (EU), relying on its normative power and universalist vocabulary, underestimates this ideational dimension and often misinterprets China’s political ideas. This imbalance shows how the EU risks losing discursive influence in an ongoing contest over meaning and agenda-setting.

Journal of East Asia SecurityVol. 1(3)
University of International Business and Economics (CN), University of Antwerp (BE), University of Science and Technology Beijing (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Belt and Road Initiative
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Europe and China’s Competing Ideas in the Belt and Road Initiative — Stefanie Weil, Nan You, et al. · Journal of East Asia Security (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS