A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE CONCEPTS OF SIR AND MUHABBET IN THE ALEVI-BEKTASHI BELIEF SYSTEM OF THE BINGÖL-KIĞI REGION WITHIN THE FRAMEWORK OF WESTERN ANTHROPOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVES

This study comparatively examines the concepts of sır (sacred mystery) and muhabbet (ritualized dialogue) within the Alevi-Bektashi faith of the Bingöl–Kiğı region, through the lens of Western anthropological theories of ritual, symbolism, and community. Employing a qualitative design, the research is based on in-depth interviews conducted with Seyyid Selçuk Sevin, a religious leader from the Kiğı–Karer area. Data were analyzed through a hermeneutic and interpretive approach, with particular attention to themes such as ritual performance, symbolic communication, and collective identity. Findings reveal that sır does not represent knowledge attainable through reason alone but rather a sacred truth disclosed only to those who undergo spiritual transformation and moral refinement. Likewise, muhabbet is not a casual conversation but a ritualized and dialogical practice that emphasizes ethical listening, spiritual maturity, and communal learning. The analysis engages with Turner’s concept of liminality, Geertz’s interpretive anthropology, and Assmann’s theory of cultural memory, thereby situating local religious practices within broader anthropological debates. Furthermore, Alevi notions of muhabbet are compared to contemporary Western community-based rituals such as sharing circles, circle work, and intentional community talks. While these practices share principles of sincerity, attentive silence, and reciprocal witnessing, Alevi practices differ in that they are deeply intertwined with the pursuit of sacred knowledge and metaphysical engagement. In this respect, the study contributes both to the deeper understanding of the Alevi-Bektashi worldview and to a critical reassessment of the applicability and limitations of Western theoretical paradigms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bingöl Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi
Published
2025-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.29029/busbed.1689688
Primary Topic
Islamic Thought and Society Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE CONCEPTS OF SIR AND MUHABBET IN THE ALEVI-BEKTASHI BELIEF SYSTEM OF THE BINGÖL-KIĞI REGION WITHIN THE FRAMEWORK OF WESTERN ANTHROPOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVES

Recai Bazancir
Bingöl Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi
Islamic Thought and Society Studies
article

A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE CONCEPTS OF SIR AND MUHABBET IN THE ALEVI-BEKTASHI BELIEF SYSTEM OF THE BINGÖL-KIĞI REGION WITHIN THE FRAMEWORK OF WESTERN ANTHROPOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVES

Recai Bazancir
article en

Abstract

This study comparatively examines the concepts of sır (sacred mystery) and muhabbet (ritualized dialogue) within the Alevi-Bektashi faith of the Bingöl–Kiğı region, through the lens of Western anthropological theories of ritual, symbolism, and community. Employing a qualitative design, the research is based on in-depth interviews conducted with Seyyid Selçuk Sevin, a religious leader from the Kiğı–Karer area. Data were analyzed through a hermeneutic and interpretive approach, with particular attention to themes such as ritual performance, symbolic communication, and collective identity. Findings reveal that sır does not represent knowledge attainable through reason alone but rather a sacred truth disclosed only to those who undergo spiritual transformation and moral refinement. Likewise, muhabbet is not a casual conversation but a ritualized and dialogical practice that emphasizes ethical listening, spiritual maturity, and communal learning. The analysis engages with Turner’s concept of liminality, Geertz’s interpretive anthropology, and Assmann’s theory of cultural memory, thereby situating local religious practices within broader anthropological debates. Furthermore, Alevi notions of muhabbet are compared to contemporary Western community-based rituals such as sharing circles, circle work, and intentional community talks. While these practices share principles of sincerity, attentive silence, and reciprocal witnessing, Alevi practices differ in that they are deeply intertwined with the pursuit of sacred knowledge and metaphysical engagement. In this respect, the study contributes both to the deeper understanding of the Alevi-Bektashi worldview and to a critical reassessment of the applicability and limitations of Western theoretical paradigms.

Bingöl Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi(30)
Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Islamic Thought and Society Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE CONCEPTS OF SIR AND MUHABBET IN THE ALEVI-BEKTASHI BELIEF SYSTEM OF THE BINGÖL-KIĞI REGION WITHIN THE FRAMEWORK OF WESTERN ANTHROPOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVES — Recai Bazancir · Bingöl Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS