The Bloch’s Multidimensional Drawing Test: A revised approach to the assessment of paranoid schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder

Background. Paranoid schizophrenia (PS) and schizoaffective disorder (SD) are complex neurodevelopmental conditions with overlapping clinical features, making their differentiation challenging. Bloch’s Multidimensional Drawing Test (MDZT), a projective psychological assessment tool, offers potential for improved differentiation between these disorders. This study aims to refine the MDZT by developing a logistic regression-based equation utilizing variables such as gender, personality shape mode (f%), and percentage of human content (M%) to enhance diagnostic accuracy.Methods. Data were collected from 94 clinical protocols of patients diagnosed with PS or SD (mean age = 34.4 ± 9 years; 80.8% male). Statistical analyses included independent samples t-tests and logistic regression applied to create an adjusted diagnostic model (Combined Variable No. 4). Key variables included personality shape mode (f%), emotional tuning index (AML), and affective irritability indicator (s).Results. Significant differences were observed between PS and SD patients in personality shape mode (f%), AML, and s variables. A strong correlation was identified between AML and s indices. While the original diagnostic equation demonstrated random accuracy, the revised logistic regression model achieved improved diagnostic precision, correctly classifying 78.7% of cases.Conclusion. The adjusted MDZT represents an improvement over previous versions and can serve as a valuable addition to a comprehensive diagnostic battery; it contributes significantly to clinical decision-making by offering unique insights into the differentiation of PS and SD. Future research should focus on validating the test in broader populations and exploring its longitudinal applications for monitoring symptom progression and treatment outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ceskoslovenska psychologie
Published
2025-10-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.51561/cspsych.69.5.350
Primary Topic
Psychological Testing and Assessment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Bloch’s Multidimensional Drawing Test: A revised approach to the assessment of paranoid schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder

Peter Tavel, Dagmar Hájková, Ivo Čermák, Jitse P. van Dijk et al.
Ceskoslovenska psychologie
Psychological Testing and Assessment
article

The Bloch’s Multidimensional Drawing Test: A revised approach to the assessment of paranoid schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder

Peter Tavel, Dagmar Hájková, Ivo Čermák, Jitse P. van Dijk, Klára Maliňáková, Radka Žídková, Lukáš Novák
article en

Abstract

Background. Paranoid schizophrenia (PS) and schizoaffective disorder (SD) are complex neurodevelopmental conditions with overlapping clinical features, making their differentiation challenging. Bloch’s Multidimensional Drawing Test (MDZT), a projective psychological assessment tool, offers potential for improved differentiation between these disorders. This study aims to refine the MDZT by developing a logistic regression-based equation utilizing variables such as gender, personality shape mode (f%), and percentage of human content (M%) to enhance diagnostic accuracy.Methods. Data were collected from 94 clinical protocols of patients diagnosed with PS or SD (mean age = 34.4 ± 9 years; 80.8% male). Statistical analyses included independent samples t-tests and logistic regression applied to create an adjusted diagnostic model (Combined Variable No. 4). Key variables included personality shape mode (f%), emotional tuning index (AML), and affective irritability indicator (s).Results. Significant differences were observed between PS and SD patients in personality shape mode (f%), AML, and s variables. A strong correlation was identified between AML and s indices. While the original diagnostic equation demonstrated random accuracy, the revised logistic regression model achieved improved diagnostic precision, correctly classifying 78.7% of cases.Conclusion. The adjusted MDZT represents an improvement over previous versions and can serve as a valuable addition to a comprehensive diagnostic battery; it contributes significantly to clinical decision-making by offering unique insights into the differentiation of PS and SD. Future research should focus on validating the test in broader populations and exploring its longitudinal applications for monitoring symptom progression and treatment outcomes.

Ceskoslovenska psychologieVol. 69(5)
University Medical Center Groningen (NL), University of Groningen (NL), Catholic University in Ruzomberok (SK), Palacký University Olomouc (CZ)
Centrum för Medicinsk Teknik och Fysik, European Regional Development Fund, European Social Fund
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Psychological Testing and Assessment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.