Multiphysics Bayesian rock physics inversion for CO2 storage monitoring

ABSTRACT Carbon capture and storage is acknowledged as one of the key technologies in the energy system transition toward low greenhouse gas emissions, as it simultaneously meets the demand for energy supply. Large-scale and safe CO2 storage requires monitoring plans to address operational and regulatory requirements as well as public acceptance. This work aimed to quantify the impact of various combinations of geophysical inputs to the accurate quantification of static and dynamic reservoir parameters in CO2 storage sites. Geophysical attributes were used as input data for multiphysics Bayesian rock physics inversion. This study quantified the contribution of P- and S-wave velocity, density, and resistivity measurements to estimate CO2 saturation, pore pressure, elastic rock properties, porosity, and a parameter related to the fluid distribution at the pore scale (patchiness). By considering case studies representative of Sleipner, Snøhvit, and Smeaheia storage sites, it was demonstrated that a well-constrained and low-uncertainty estimation of CO2 saturation requires the use of resistivity input data. Accurate pore pressure estimation is difficult and has to take advantage of all possible input data and, if available, prior information to be able to be discriminated from saturation effects. The patchiness parameter cannot be accurately recovered regardless of data inputs considered in this study, but it does not prevent a proper estimation of CO2 saturation. Porosity estimation requires density data, whereas rock frame mechanical moduli estimation requires S-wave velocity information. Use of prior information is always beneficial to better constrain the estimates. Quantifying the dynamic reservoir parameters with uncertainty estimation is crucial for conformance monitoring where observed and modeled behaviors of the CO2 injection and migration in the reservoir need to be verified by the operator.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geophysics
Published
2025-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1190/geo-2025-0165
Primary Topic
Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multiphysics Bayesian rock physics inversion for CO2 storage monitoring

B. Emmel, Nicolás D. Barbosa, Bastien Dupuy, Amir Ghaderi et al.
Geophysics
Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
article

Multiphysics Bayesian rock physics inversion for CO2 storage monitoring

B. Emmel, Nicolás D. Barbosa, Bastien Dupuy, Amir Ghaderi, Per Eirik Strand Bergmo, Peder Eliasson
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Carbon capture and storage is acknowledged as one of the key technologies in the energy system transition toward low greenhouse gas emissions, as it simultaneously meets the demand for energy supply. Large-scale and safe CO2 storage requires monitoring plans to address operational and regulatory requirements as well as public acceptance. This work aimed to quantify the impact of various combinations of geophysical inputs to the accurate quantification of static and dynamic reservoir parameters in CO2 storage sites. Geophysical attributes were used as input data for multiphysics Bayesian rock physics inversion. This study quantified the contribution of P- and S-wave velocity, density, and resistivity measurements to estimate CO2 saturation, pore pressure, elastic rock properties, porosity, and a parameter related to the fluid distribution at the pore scale (patchiness). By considering case studies representative of Sleipner, Snøhvit, and Smeaheia storage sites, it was demonstrated that a well-constrained and low-uncertainty estimation of CO2 saturation requires the use of resistivity input data. Accurate pore pressure estimation is difficult and has to take advantage of all possible input data and, if available, prior information to be able to be discriminated from saturation effects. The patchiness parameter cannot be accurately recovered regardless of data inputs considered in this study, but it does not prevent a proper estimation of CO2 saturation. Porosity estimation requires density data, whereas rock frame mechanical moduli estimation requires S-wave velocity information. Use of prior information is always beneficial to better constrain the estimates. Quantifying the dynamic reservoir parameters with uncertainty estimation is crucial for conformance monitoring where observed and modeled behaviors of the CO2 injection and migration in the reservoir need to be verified by the operator.

GeophysicsVol. 91(1)
SINTEF (NO), Trondheim Kommune (NO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.