Uncertainty quantification of well log predictions

Abstract Uncertainty quantification (UQ) in well log prediction remains a significant challenge within geoscientific research because conventional methodologies yield single point estimates without addressing the associated predictive uncertainty. The absence of uncertainty assessment may result in suboptimal decisions during exploration phases and reservoir characterization. This study addressed this limitation by applying the conformalized quantile regression (CQR) technique to predict missing AC (P-Sonic) acoustic log curves while simultaneously quantifying the uncertainty of these predictions. The analysis used nine Log ASCII Standard (LAS) files from the Volve Field, with exploratory data analysis revealing substantial missingness, particularly in AC (P-Sonic) logs. Pearson correlation analysis identified strong relationships between AC (P-Sonic), density (DEN), and neutron (NEU) logs. The conformal prediction framework partitions the dataset into training, validation, and test subsets, enabling the derivation of statistically valid prediction intervals. The CQR approach achieved AC (P-Sonic) log predictions with 95% coverage. This work demonstrated the value of UQ in well log prediction by providing accurate predictions accompanied by reliable prediction intervals, thereby supporting robust and informed decision-making in exploration and reservoir characterization. The methodology developed herein offers a comprehensive tool for risk management, enabling geoscientists to proactively identify and mitigate potential adverse outcomes associated with well-log data utilization.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Interpretation
Published
2025-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1190/int-2025-0008
Primary Topic
Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Uncertainty quantification of well log predictions

Interpretation
Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
article

Uncertainty quantification of well log predictions

article en

Abstract

Abstract Uncertainty quantification (UQ) in well log prediction remains a significant challenge within geoscientific research because conventional methodologies yield single point estimates without addressing the associated predictive uncertainty. The absence of uncertainty assessment may result in suboptimal decisions during exploration phases and reservoir characterization. This study addressed this limitation by applying the conformalized quantile regression (CQR) technique to predict missing AC (P-Sonic) acoustic log curves while simultaneously quantifying the uncertainty of these predictions. The analysis used nine Log ASCII Standard (LAS) files from the Volve Field, with exploratory data analysis revealing substantial missingness, particularly in AC (P-Sonic) logs. Pearson correlation analysis identified strong relationships between AC (P-Sonic), density (DEN), and neutron (NEU) logs. The conformal prediction framework partitions the dataset into training, validation, and test subsets, enabling the derivation of statistically valid prediction intervals. The CQR approach achieved AC (P-Sonic) log predictions with 95% coverage. This work demonstrated the value of UQ in well log prediction by providing accurate predictions accompanied by reliable prediction intervals, thereby supporting robust and informed decision-making in exploration and reservoir characterization. The methodology developed herein offers a comprehensive tool for risk management, enabling geoscientists to proactively identify and mitigate potential adverse outcomes associated with well-log data utilization.

InterpretationVol. 14(1)
Woodlands Hospital (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.