From rights to runtime: Privacy engineering for agentic AI

Abstract Agentic AI shifts stacks from request‐response to plan‐execute. Systems no longer just answer; they act—planning tasks, calling tools, keeping memory, and changing external state. That shift moves privacy from policy docs into the runtime. This opinion piece argues that we do not need a new privacy theory for agents; we need enforceable, observable controls that render existing rights as product behavior. Anchoring on GDPR—with portable touchpoints to CPRA, LGPD, and PDPA, we propose a developer‐first toolkit: optional, bounded, user‐visible memory; a purpose‐aware egress gate that enforces minimization and transfer rules; proportional safeguards that scale with stakes; and traces that tell a coherent story across components and suppliers. We show how the EU AI Act's risk management, logging, and oversight can scaffold these controls and enable evidence reuse. The result is an agentic runtime that keeps people in control and teams audit‐ready by design.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AI Magazine
Published
2025-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/aaai.70036
Primary Topic
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From rights to runtime: Privacy engineering for agentic AI

Keivan Navaie
AI Magazine
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
article

From rights to runtime: Privacy engineering for agentic AI

Keivan Navaie
article en

Abstract

Abstract Agentic AI shifts stacks from request‐response to plan‐execute. Systems no longer just answer; they act—planning tasks, calling tools, keeping memory, and changing external state. That shift moves privacy from policy docs into the runtime. This opinion piece argues that we do not need a new privacy theory for agents; we need enforceable, observable controls that render existing rights as product behavior. Anchoring on GDPR—with portable touchpoints to CPRA, LGPD, and PDPA, we propose a developer‐first toolkit: optional, bounded, user‐visible memory; a purpose‐aware egress gate that enforces minimization and transfer rules; proportional safeguards that scale with stakes; and traces that tell a coherent story across components and suppliers. We show how the EU AI Act's risk management, logging, and oversight can scaffold these controls and enable evidence reuse. The result is an agentic runtime that keeps people in control and teams audit‐ready by design.

AI MagazineVol. 46(4)
Lancaster University (GB)
European Commission
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

From rights to runtime: Privacy engineering for agentic AI — Keivan Navaie · AI Magazine (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS