Nature-inclusive farming results in higher arthropod abundance, without compromising agricultural productivity

Nature-inclusive farming aims to balance agricultural productivity with environmental sustainability. Measures such as creating more semi-natural areas and reducing pesticide use, which are central to nature-inclusive farming, are expected to benefit arthropod biodiversity. However, it is unclear whether the expected increased abundance of natural enemies effectively enhances biological pest control and thus helps farmers achieve yields similar to conventional farming. This study examines the relationships between farming systems, pest and natural enemy abundance and how these affect potato yield quantity and quality. We sampled 20 potato fields in nature-inclusive and conventional farming systems, in Western Netherlands. In each field, we surveyed natural enemies, pests, and other arthropods, and quantified leaf damage both early and late in the growing season. Later in the season, potatoes were harvested, tuber damage was assessed and yield quantity and quality were determined. Our results showed that potato fields in the nature-inclusive farming supported higher arthropod abundance, including pests, natural enemies and other species. In the conventional farming, pests increased throughout the season, while natural enemies decreased over time and with distance from the field edge. In the nature-inclusive farming, pests also increased over time and decreased with distance from the field edge. Yield quantity and yield quality did not differ significantly between farming systems. These results indicate the possibility to boost within-field biodiversity and reduce agro-chemical input without compromising agricultural productivity per hectare with nature-inclusive farming systems. These approaches require agricultural land taken out of production, so overall less land is available for farming. • Nature-inclusive farming supported higher arthropod abundance. • Pests populations increased over time in both farming systems. • In conventional fields, natural enemies declined over the season. • Potato yield did not differ significantly between farming systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment
Published
2025-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2025.110033
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Urban Agriculture and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.75

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Nature-inclusive farming results in higher arthropod abundance, without compromising agricultural productivity

Fons van der Plas, David Kleijn, Nuno Alexandre, Iryna Litovska et al.
1 citations
Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment
Urban Agriculture and Sustainability
1.75
article

Nature-inclusive farming results in higher arthropod abundance, without compromising agricultural productivity

Fons van der Plas, David Kleijn, Nuno Alexandre, Iryna Litovska, Guido Buijs
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Nature-inclusive farming aims to balance agricultural productivity with environmental sustainability. Measures such as creating more semi-natural areas and reducing pesticide use, which are central to nature-inclusive farming, are expected to benefit arthropod biodiversity. However, it is unclear whether the expected increased abundance of natural enemies effectively enhances biological pest control and thus helps farmers achieve yields similar to conventional farming. This study examines the relationships between farming systems, pest and natural enemy abundance and how these affect potato yield quantity and quality. We sampled 20 potato fields in nature-inclusive and conventional farming systems, in Western Netherlands. In each field, we surveyed natural enemies, pests, and other arthropods, and quantified leaf damage both early and late in the growing season. Later in the season, potatoes were harvested, tuber damage was assessed and yield quantity and quality were determined. Our results showed that potato fields in the nature-inclusive farming supported higher arthropod abundance, including pests, natural enemies and other species. In the conventional farming, pests increased throughout the season, while natural enemies decreased over time and with distance from the field edge. In the nature-inclusive farming, pests also increased over time and decreased with distance from the field edge. Yield quantity and yield quality did not differ significantly between farming systems. These results indicate the possibility to boost within-field biodiversity and reduce agro-chemical input without compromising agricultural productivity per hectare with nature-inclusive farming systems. These approaches require agricultural land taken out of production, so overall less land is available for farming. • Nature-inclusive farming supported higher arthropod abundance. • Pests populations increased over time in both farming systems. • In conventional fields, natural enemies declined over the season. • Potato yield did not differ significantly between farming systems.

Agriculture Ecosystems & EnvironmentVol. 397
Wageningen University & Research (NL)
Wageningen University and Research
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Urban Agriculture and Sustainability
1.75
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.