Using two-sided messages to combat misinformation: An overview

Two-sided messages, that is, communications that acknowledge both sides of an issue while still advocating for one, are a potential approach for correcting misinformation and fostering openness to correction information. In this article, we explore the effectiveness of using two-sided messages. Drawing parallels between attitude change and misinformation correction, we summarize recent studies demonstrating that individuals with deeply entrenched beliefs become more receptive to changing them when their perspectives are acknowledged in two-sided (versus one-sided) communications. Key mechanisms described include reciprocity and enhanced source credibility. Practical implications suggest that communicators, policymakers, and educators could incorporate two-sided messaging to correct misinformation, particularly targeting individuals with strongly held misbeliefs. By acknowledging the reasons behind the acceptance of misinformation while presenting factual corrections, this approach can bridge divides, encourage openness to alternative viewpoints, and ultimately facilitate belief correction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Behavioral Science & Policy
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/23794607251382992
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Misinformation and Its Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Using two-sided messages to combat misinformation: An overview

Richard E. Petty, Mengran Xu
2 citations
Behavioral Science & Policy
Misinformation and Its Impacts
8.40
article

Using two-sided messages to combat misinformation: An overview

Richard E. Petty, Mengran Xu
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Two-sided messages, that is, communications that acknowledge both sides of an issue while still advocating for one, are a potential approach for correcting misinformation and fostering openness to correction information. In this article, we explore the effectiveness of using two-sided messages. Drawing parallels between attitude change and misinformation correction, we summarize recent studies demonstrating that individuals with deeply entrenched beliefs become more receptive to changing them when their perspectives are acknowledged in two-sided (versus one-sided) communications. Key mechanisms described include reciprocity and enhanced source credibility. Practical implications suggest that communicators, policymakers, and educators could incorporate two-sided messaging to correct misinformation, particularly targeting individuals with strongly held misbeliefs. By acknowledging the reasons behind the acceptance of misinformation while presenting factual corrections, this approach can bridge divides, encourage openness to alternative viewpoints, and ultimately facilitate belief correction.

Behavioral Science & PolicyVol. 11(2)
Fudan University (CN), The Ohio State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Misinformation and Its Impacts
8.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.