Energy restriction optimizes energy partitioning and remodels intestinal energy metabolism in layer pullets

This study aimed to investigate the effects of different energy-restricted program on energy metabolism in layer pullets. A total of 168 birds were randomly divided into 3 groups: regular energy (RE), energy level restriction (ER, 0.55 MJ/kg lower than RE) and feed restriction (FR, about 88 % of ad libitum intake), with 7 replicates per group and 8 birds per replicate. Indirect calorimetry and targeted metabolomics were employed to assess energy partitioning and intestinal metabolic profiles in pullets across different groups. Results showed that feed restriction significantly decreased feed conversion ratio (FCR), apparent metabolizable energy (AME) intake, retained energy and retained energy as fat compared to RE group (P < 0.05). Moreover, feed restriction up-regulated ileal gene expression of glucose transporter 2 (GLUT2), phosphofructokinase (PFK) and Na⁺/K⁺-ATPase β1 subunit (ATP1B1) in pullets (P < 0.05). Compared to RE group, energy level restriction improved retained energy as protein in pullets (P < 0.05). Additionally, pullets in ER group exhibited significantly (P < 0.05) increased adenosine monophosphate (AMP)/adenosine triphosphate (ATP) ratio and reduced adenylate energy charge (AEC) content. In terms of metabolic profiling, energy restriction down-regulated 7 metabolites in ileum, including glycolytic intermediates, such as phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP), fructose-1,6-biophosphate (F-1,6-BP) and 2-phosphoglycerate (2-PGA), while feed restriction decreased two metabolites and improved flavin-mononucleotide content in ileal mucosa. Hence, both feed and energy level restriction optimized energy deposition without compromising intestinal morphology and growth performance. Energy level restriction decreased energy status in ileal mucosa, as evidenced by reduced AEC content primarily resulting from suppressed glycolytic flux.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Poultry Science
Published
2025-10-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2025.105985
Primary Topic
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Energy restriction optimizes energy partitioning and remodels intestinal energy metabolism in layer pullets

Bei Huang, Zhibin Ban, Jianjun Wang, Qiuyu Jiang et al.
Poultry Science
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
article

Energy restriction optimizes energy partitioning and remodels intestinal energy metabolism in layer pullets

Bei Huang, Zhibin Ban, Jianjun Wang, Qiuyu Jiang, Kai Zheng
article en

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the effects of different energy-restricted program on energy metabolism in layer pullets. A total of 168 birds were randomly divided into 3 groups: regular energy (RE), energy level restriction (ER, 0.55 MJ/kg lower than RE) and feed restriction (FR, about 88 % of ad libitum intake), with 7 replicates per group and 8 birds per replicate. Indirect calorimetry and targeted metabolomics were employed to assess energy partitioning and intestinal metabolic profiles in pullets across different groups. Results showed that feed restriction significantly decreased feed conversion ratio (FCR), apparent metabolizable energy (AME) intake, retained energy and retained energy as fat compared to RE group (P < 0.05). Moreover, feed restriction up-regulated ileal gene expression of glucose transporter 2 (GLUT2), phosphofructokinase (PFK) and Na⁺/K⁺-ATPase β1 subunit (ATP1B1) in pullets (P < 0.05). Compared to RE group, energy level restriction improved retained energy as protein in pullets (P < 0.05). Additionally, pullets in ER group exhibited significantly (P < 0.05) increased adenosine monophosphate (AMP)/adenosine triphosphate (ATP) ratio and reduced adenylate energy charge (AEC) content. In terms of metabolic profiling, energy restriction down-regulated 7 metabolites in ileum, including glycolytic intermediates, such as phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP), fructose-1,6-biophosphate (F-1,6-BP) and 2-phosphoglycerate (2-PGA), while feed restriction decreased two metabolites and improved flavin-mononucleotide content in ileal mucosa. Hence, both feed and energy level restriction optimized energy deposition without compromising intestinal morphology and growth performance. Energy level restriction decreased energy status in ileal mucosa, as evidenced by reduced AEC content primarily resulting from suppressed glycolytic flux.

Poultry ScienceVol. 104(12)
Jilin Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CN), Institute of Animal Sciences (CN), China Agricultural University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.