Sustainable Assessing Cross-Border Renewable Energy Alliances Using Neutrosophic Numbers with Long-Term Energy Transition Planning

This paper proposes a decision-making methodology for Sustainable assessing cross-border renewable energy alliances. We used two decision-making methods such as Entropy and MABAC methods. Entropy method is used to compute the criteria weights. The MABAC method is used to rank the alternatives. Two methods are used under the neutrosophic number to solve uncertainty in the decision making. Three stages of the proposed approach are conducted. In the first stage, we compute the criteria weights. In the second stage, we rank the alternatives. In the third stage, we conducted the sensitivity analysis to show the stability of the ranks. The results show the ranks of alternatives are stable under different ten cases.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neutrosophic Systems with Applications
Published
2025-10-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.63689/2993-7159.1304
Primary Topic
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sustainable Assessing Cross-Border Renewable Energy Alliances Using Neutrosophic Numbers with Long-Term Energy Transition Planning

Kamal Alieyan, Amr A. Abd El-Mageed
Neutrosophic Systems with Applications
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
article

Sustainable Assessing Cross-Border Renewable Energy Alliances Using Neutrosophic Numbers with Long-Term Energy Transition Planning

Kamal Alieyan, Amr A. Abd El-Mageed
article en

Abstract

This paper proposes a decision-making methodology for Sustainable assessing cross-border renewable energy alliances. We used two decision-making methods such as Entropy and MABAC methods. Entropy method is used to compute the criteria weights. The MABAC method is used to rank the alternatives. Two methods are used under the neutrosophic number to solve uncertainty in the decision making. Three stages of the proposed approach are conducted. In the first stage, we compute the criteria weights. In the second stage, we rank the alternatives. In the third stage, we conducted the sensitivity analysis to show the stability of the ranks. The results show the ranks of alternatives are stable under different ten cases.

Neutrosophic Systems with ApplicationsVol. 25(10)
Amman Arab University (JO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.