A study of the neural mechanisms by which reference groups and low-carbon product types influence individual purchase decisions

Low-carbon consumption is an important way to alleviate environmental and resource pressures and realize sustainable development, but the existence of problems such as information asymmetry of implicit low-carbon products often hinders consumers' willingness to purchase. Nowadays, with the booming development of online social media, reference groups have become the main way to influence individual purchase decisions, However, the academic community lacks clarity on how these different reference groups influence low-carbon products with different attributes purchases and the underlying neural mechanisms. Therefore, grounded in the Elaboration Likelihood Model (ELM), this study investigated the psychological mechanism of the interaction between reference group type (membership vs. aspirational) and low-carbon product attributes (explicit vs. implicit) on individuals' low-carbon purchase decisions using ERP and behavioral experiments. Our ERP and behavioral results reveal that in the early attention-getting stage (peripheral paths), the P200 amplitude induced by the member group was larger than that of the desire group, regardless of the attributes of the low-carbon product. This indicates that, in the early stage, consumers pay attention to the recommending group first, rather than the attributes of low-carbon products. More importantly, consumers pay attention to the recommendation of the member group rather than the aspirational group. In the later stage of evaluating decision-making (central paths), it was found that the recommendation of explicit low-carbon products by the eager group and the recommendation of implicit low-carbon products by the membership group induce relatively small N400 amplitudes, indicating that the two combinations of individuals have less perceived conflict; the former improves the individual's perceived benefit, and the latter reduces the individual's perceived risk, which is in line with the final results of the individual's purchasing decision. The findings reveal the role and neural mechanisms of reference groups in influencing individuals to purchase low-carbon products with different attributes, which promotes theoretical research and practical expansion of low-carbon consumption and neuromarketing,and provides a theoretical basis for enterprises to gain more attention and formulate more effective marketing strategies in the low-carbon market.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cleaner and Responsible Consumption
Published
2025-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clrc.2025.100346
Primary Topic
Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A study of the neural mechanisms by which reference groups and low-carbon product types influence individual purchase decisions

Lei Mei, Shuang Li, Peng Zhang, Jing Feng
Cleaner and Responsible Consumption
Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
article

A study of the neural mechanisms by which reference groups and low-carbon product types influence individual purchase decisions

Lei Mei, Shuang Li, Peng Zhang, Jing Feng
article en

Abstract

Low-carbon consumption is an important way to alleviate environmental and resource pressures and realize sustainable development, but the existence of problems such as information asymmetry of implicit low-carbon products often hinders consumers' willingness to purchase. Nowadays, with the booming development of online social media, reference groups have become the main way to influence individual purchase decisions, However, the academic community lacks clarity on how these different reference groups influence low-carbon products with different attributes purchases and the underlying neural mechanisms. Therefore, grounded in the Elaboration Likelihood Model (ELM), this study investigated the psychological mechanism of the interaction between reference group type (membership vs. aspirational) and low-carbon product attributes (explicit vs. implicit) on individuals' low-carbon purchase decisions using ERP and behavioral experiments. Our ERP and behavioral results reveal that in the early attention-getting stage (peripheral paths), the P200 amplitude induced by the member group was larger than that of the desire group, regardless of the attributes of the low-carbon product. This indicates that, in the early stage, consumers pay attention to the recommending group first, rather than the attributes of low-carbon products. More importantly, consumers pay attention to the recommendation of the member group rather than the aspirational group. In the later stage of evaluating decision-making (central paths), it was found that the recommendation of explicit low-carbon products by the eager group and the recommendation of implicit low-carbon products by the membership group induce relatively small N400 amplitudes, indicating that the two combinations of individuals have less perceived conflict; the former improves the individual's perceived benefit, and the latter reduces the individual's perceived risk, which is in line with the final results of the individual's purchasing decision. The findings reveal the role and neural mechanisms of reference groups in influencing individuals to purchase low-carbon products with different attributes, which promotes theoretical research and practical expansion of low-carbon consumption and neuromarketing,and provides a theoretical basis for enterprises to gain more attention and formulate more effective marketing strategies in the low-carbon market.

Cleaner and Responsible ConsumptionVol. 19
Inner Mongolia University of Science and Technology (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.