Current Practices and Perspectives of Clinicians on Glucose Monitoring in Indian Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Abstract Objective: The primary objective of this survey was to understand clinicians’ practices and perspectives regarding glucose monitoring in Indian patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in real-world clinical settings. Methods: This cross-sectional, questionnaire-based survey, conducted between January and April 2024, gathered opinions from clinicians across India. Data were analyzed and expressed as descriptive statistics. Results: A total of 310 clinicians participated in the survey. Most clinicians (78.39%) opined that glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) was the most used confirmatory test for diabetes. Preference for HbA1c over other tests continued in T2DM patients treated with various antihyperglycemic drug classes, including oral anti-hyperglycemic drugs (OADs, 74.19%) and injectable agents: non-insulin (67.42%) and insulins (premix [46.77%], basal [41.94%], and basal plus ≥1 rapid-acting [40.65%]). Regarding laboratory-based testing, 38.06% and 90.00% of clinicians recommended HbA1c and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) three times per year, respectively, and 76.45% recommended postprandial plasma glucose (PPG) ≥4 times per year. Self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) was recommended in >60% T2DM patients on insulin by 51.61% clinicians. Daily 2-point and weekly 7-point SMBG regimens had maximum patient compliance according to 26.45% and 21.29% clinicians, respectively. FPG (among the predefined time-points: fasting, pre-breakfast, post-breakfast, pre-lunch, post-lunch, pre-dinner, post-dinner, bedtime, and midnight blood glucose) was the most frequently recommended time point for self-monitoring in T2DM patients across various pharmacological treatments (OADs [75.48%] and insulins: basal [79.03%], premix [72.26%], and basal plus ≥1 rapid-acting [74.84%]). In T2DM patients, continuous/flash glucose monitoring was suggested by 58.71% clinicians for up to 20% patients on OADs and by 70.97% clinicians for up to 40% of patients on insulin therapy. Conclusion: The survey reveals a multifaceted approach among Indian clinicians regarding glucose monitoring in T2DM patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Diabetes and Technology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4103/ijdt.ijdt_29_25
Primary Topic
Diabetes Management and Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Current Practices and Perspectives of Clinicians on Glucose Monitoring in Indian Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Vyankatesh Shivane, Priyamvada Tyagi, Pramila Kalra, Sushil Kotru et al.
International Journal of Diabetes and Technology
Diabetes Management and Research
article

Current Practices and Perspectives of Clinicians on Glucose Monitoring in Indian Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Vyankatesh Shivane, Priyamvada Tyagi, Pramila Kalra, Sushil Kotru, Sujoy Majumdar, Yogesh Kadam, Blessy Saju, Bharat Saboo, Amarnath Sugumaran, Sanjeev Phatak, Rahul Iyer, Senthilnathan Mohanasundaram, Arun Nanditha, Nilakshi Deka
article en

Abstract

Abstract Objective: The primary objective of this survey was to understand clinicians’ practices and perspectives regarding glucose monitoring in Indian patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in real-world clinical settings. Methods: This cross-sectional, questionnaire-based survey, conducted between January and April 2024, gathered opinions from clinicians across India. Data were analyzed and expressed as descriptive statistics. Results: A total of 310 clinicians participated in the survey. Most clinicians (78.39%) opined that glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) was the most used confirmatory test for diabetes. Preference for HbA1c over other tests continued in T2DM patients treated with various antihyperglycemic drug classes, including oral anti-hyperglycemic drugs (OADs, 74.19%) and injectable agents: non-insulin (67.42%) and insulins (premix [46.77%], basal [41.94%], and basal plus ≥1 rapid-acting [40.65%]). Regarding laboratory-based testing, 38.06% and 90.00% of clinicians recommended HbA1c and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) three times per year, respectively, and 76.45% recommended postprandial plasma glucose (PPG) ≥4 times per year. Self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) was recommended in >60% T2DM patients on insulin by 51.61% clinicians. Daily 2-point and weekly 7-point SMBG regimens had maximum patient compliance according to 26.45% and 21.29% clinicians, respectively. FPG (among the predefined time-points: fasting, pre-breakfast, post-breakfast, pre-lunch, post-lunch, pre-dinner, post-dinner, bedtime, and midnight blood glucose) was the most frequently recommended time point for self-monitoring in T2DM patients across various pharmacological treatments (OADs [75.48%] and insulins: basal [79.03%], premix [72.26%], and basal plus ≥1 rapid-acting [74.84%]). In T2DM patients, continuous/flash glucose monitoring was suggested by 58.71% clinicians for up to 20% patients on OADs and by 70.97% clinicians for up to 40% of patients on insulin therapy. Conclusion: The survey reveals a multifaceted approach among Indian clinicians regarding glucose monitoring in T2DM patients.

International Journal of Diabetes and TechnologyVol. 4(4)
Apollo Gleneagles Hospitals (IN), Max Super Speciality Hospital (IN), Midas Multispeciality Hospital (IN), Diabetes Care and Research Foundation (IN), Dr. A. Ramachandran's Diabetes Hospitals (IN), Apollo Hospitals (IN), Swasthya Diabetes Care (IN), Diabetes Care & Hormone Clinic (IN), Cipla (India) (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Diabetes Management and Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.