Household cooking fuels, their environmental impacts and community priority interventions in refugee settlements in Uganda

Africa hosts approximately 14 million refugees; nearly one-third of the global refugee population. Uganda alone hosts over 1.8 million refugees, with their settlement on small plots of land (~ 50 × 50 m), within host communities exerting pressure on natural resources and accelerating environmental degradation. This paper presents a study on the root causes and consequences of woodfuel sourcing and utilization and community priority interventions in Rhino and Imvepi Refugee Settlements in Uganda for informed decision making. Data was collected via a household survey through personal communication with 381 respondents (62 men, 319 women), key informant interviews (KIIs) and focus group discussions (FGDs). The results showed that firewood was the dominant fuel used by 96 % of hosts and 97 % of refugees, followed by charcoal (40 % and 59 %, respectively). Fuel stacking (using more than one fuel type) was reported by 48 % of hosts and 73 % of refugee households. Our study highlights that refugees presented greater reliance on charcoal and crop residues, reflecting firewood scarcity and charcoal's availability as a traded commodity. Women and children, particularly among refugees, faced greater hardships in accessing firewood. Environmental degradation from woodfuel sourcing and utilization is driven by socio-cultural norms, economic hardship, weak policy enforcement and inadequate skills and poor awareness of sustainable practices; leading to deforestation, air pollution, soil degradation, biodiversity loss and adverse impacts on livelihoods. The root causes and impacts from woodfuel sourcing and use are complex and deeply interconnected, highlighting the need for transdisciplinary, gender-responsive and context-specific approaches to promote sustainable and cleaner woodfuel systems in both host and refugee communities. • Firewood dominated cooking fuel for both hosts and refugees, followed by charcoal. • Refugees relied more on charcoal and crop residues due to firewood scarcity • Refugee women and children faced greater hardships in firewood collection. • Causes of degradation: beliefs, poverty, weak laws and low awareness on woodfuel • Interventions: sensitization, tree growing, better technology and stronger policies

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Sustainable Development/Energy for sustainable development
Published
2025-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2025.101874
Primary Topic
Energy and Environment Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Household cooking fuels, their environmental impacts and community priority interventions in refugee settlements in Uganda

Majid Sedighi, Mary Njenga, Prossy Kyomuhendo, Yahaya Minjinyawa
Energy Sustainable Development/Energy for sustainable development
Energy and Environment Impacts
article

Household cooking fuels, their environmental impacts and community priority interventions in refugee settlements in Uganda

Majid Sedighi, Mary Njenga, Prossy Kyomuhendo, Yahaya Minjinyawa
article en

Abstract

Africa hosts approximately 14 million refugees; nearly one-third of the global refugee population. Uganda alone hosts over 1.8 million refugees, with their settlement on small plots of land (~ 50 × 50 m), within host communities exerting pressure on natural resources and accelerating environmental degradation. This paper presents a study on the root causes and consequences of woodfuel sourcing and utilization and community priority interventions in Rhino and Imvepi Refugee Settlements in Uganda for informed decision making. Data was collected via a household survey through personal communication with 381 respondents (62 men, 319 women), key informant interviews (KIIs) and focus group discussions (FGDs). The results showed that firewood was the dominant fuel used by 96 % of hosts and 97 % of refugees, followed by charcoal (40 % and 59 %, respectively). Fuel stacking (using more than one fuel type) was reported by 48 % of hosts and 73 % of refugee households. Our study highlights that refugees presented greater reliance on charcoal and crop residues, reflecting firewood scarcity and charcoal's availability as a traded commodity. Women and children, particularly among refugees, faced greater hardships in accessing firewood. Environmental degradation from woodfuel sourcing and utilization is driven by socio-cultural norms, economic hardship, weak policy enforcement and inadequate skills and poor awareness of sustainable practices; leading to deforestation, air pollution, soil degradation, biodiversity loss and adverse impacts on livelihoods. The root causes and impacts from woodfuel sourcing and use are complex and deeply interconnected, highlighting the need for transdisciplinary, gender-responsive and context-specific approaches to promote sustainable and cleaner woodfuel systems in both host and refugee communities. • Firewood dominated cooking fuel for both hosts and refugees, followed by charcoal. • Refugees relied more on charcoal and crop residues due to firewood scarcity • Refugee women and children faced greater hardships in firewood collection. • Causes of degradation: beliefs, poverty, weak laws and low awareness on woodfuel • Interventions: sensitization, tree growing, better technology and stronger policies

Energy Sustainable Development/Energy for sustainable developmentVol. 89
University of Nairobi (KE), Cocoa Research Institute of Nigeria (NG), University of Manchester (GB), Manchester School of Architecture (GB), World Agroforestry Centre (KE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Energy and Environment Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.