Education and Inequality:

This paper compares Thomas Piketty’s Capital and Ideology and Bowles and Gintis’ Schooling in Capitalist America, examining their views on the role of education in perpetuating economic inequality. Despite irreconcilable theoretical foundations, both works converge on a critical conclusion: education intensifies rather than mitigates inequality, particularly through intergenerational wealth transmission and hypocritical meritocracy. With regards to intergenerational inequality, we discuss its connection with the change in the voting pattern observed by Piketty in Western social-democratic nations, where left-of-centre parties have become less interested in the most disadvantaged classes over the past several decades. The paper also identifies key limitations shared by the framework of both books, including an inadequate analysis of fiscal austerity and demographic change as drivers of educational inequality. Finally, both works advocate socialist solutions-participatory socialism (for Piketty) and revolutionary change (for Bowles and Gintis)–to dismantle power imbalances that generate inequality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Income Distribution
Published
2025-10-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25071/1874-6322.40631
Primary Topic
Social Policy and Reform Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Education and Inequality:

Silvia Leoni, Andrea Gentili
Journal of Income Distribution
Social Policy and Reform Studies
article

Education and Inequality:

Silvia Leoni, Andrea Gentili
article en

Abstract

This paper compares Thomas Piketty’s Capital and Ideology and Bowles and Gintis’ Schooling in Capitalist America, examining their views on the role of education in perpetuating economic inequality. Despite irreconcilable theoretical foundations, both works converge on a critical conclusion: education intensifies rather than mitigates inequality, particularly through intergenerational wealth transmission and hypocritical meritocracy. With regards to intergenerational inequality, we discuss its connection with the change in the voting pattern observed by Piketty in Western social-democratic nations, where left-of-centre parties have become less interested in the most disadvantaged classes over the past several decades. The paper also identifies key limitations shared by the framework of both books, including an inadequate analysis of fiscal austerity and demographic change as drivers of educational inequality. Finally, both works advocate socialist solutions-participatory socialism (for Piketty) and revolutionary change (for Bowles and Gintis)–to dismantle power imbalances that generate inequality.

Journal of Income Distribution
Mercatorum University (IT), University of Florence (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Social Policy and Reform Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.