Comparison of percutaneous 60-day peripheral nerve stimulation of the lumbar medial branches to usual care with standard interventional management for chronic low back pain—a multicenter pragmatic randomized controlled trial (RESET)

This prospective multicenter pragmatic RCT met its Primary Clinical Endpoint and found that more participants with CLBP reported pain relief at 3 months after receiving percutaneous 60-day PNS as compared to usual care with standard interventional management. Participants treated with 60-day PNS showed greater reductions in pain and more substantial improvements in functional outcomes through 6 months.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pain Medicine
Published
2025-10-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnaf147
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Pain Management and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.38
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of percutaneous 60-day peripheral nerve stimulation of the lumbar medial branches to usual care with standard interventional management for chronic low back pain—a multicenter pragmatic randomized controlled trial (RESET)

Morad Nasseri, Mitchell Engle, Thomas S. Lee, Christopher A Gilmore et al.
2 citations
Pain Medicine
Pain Management and Treatment
4.38
article

Comparison of percutaneous 60-day peripheral nerve stimulation of the lumbar medial branches to usual care with standard interventional management for chronic low back pain—a multicenter pragmatic randomized controlled trial (RESET)

Morad Nasseri, Mitchell Engle, Thomas S. Lee, Christopher A Gilmore, Meredith J. McGee, Kasra Amirdelfan, Timothy R. Deer, Steven Paul Cohen, Mehul J. Desai, Tristan Weaver, Scott Davidoff, Zachary L. McCormick, William H. Clark, Joseph W. Boggs, Drew M Trainor, Shivanand P. Lad, Sean Li, Michael J. DePalma, Meenakshi Bindal, Francesco Vetri, Denise Lester, Jessica Jameson, Melissa A Tornero-Bold
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This prospective multicenter pragmatic RCT met its Primary Clinical Endpoint and found that more participants with CLBP reported pain relief at 3 months after receiving percutaneous 60-day PNS as compared to usual care with standard interventional management. Participants treated with 60-day PNS showed greater reductions in pain and more substantial improvements in functional outcomes through 6 months.

Pain Medicine
Northwestern University (US), Virginia Department of Health (US), Main Line Health (US), John Muir Health (US), Duke University (US), Winston-Salem State University (US), University of Utah (US), University of Virginia Health System (US), Walter Reed National Military Medical Center (US), North Idaho College (US), Coeur d Alene Arthritis Clinic (US), Northwestern University (PH), Virginia Spine Research Institute (US), Sprint PNS System (United States) (US), Southeast Clinical Oncology Research Consortium (US), Pain Management Centers Of America (US), Millennium Pain Center (US), The Spine & Nerve Centers of the Virginias (US), Northwestern Medicine (US), VA Central California Health Care System (US), Duke University Hospital (US), Sensory Processing Disorder Foundation (US), International Spine, Pain & Performance (US), LifeBridge Health (US), The Ohio State University (US), Texas A&M University – Corpus Christi (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Pain Management and Treatment
4.38
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.