Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Utilization of Top and Bottom Gender Affirming Surgeries Among Eligible Transgender Adults

<b>Introduction:</b> Gender-affirming surgery (GAS) is a critical step for many transgender individuals seeking alignment between their physical appearance and gender identity. However, disparities in access to GAS across racial and ethnic groups remain inadequately addressed. This study aims to examine racial and ethnic disparities in access to top and bottom gender-affirming surgeries. <b>Methods:</b> A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted using the TriNetX database (2014-2024). Patients aged 18+ with a diagnosis of gender dysphoria who completed at least 6 months of hormone therapy were included. Patients were identified using ICD-10 and CPT codes and stratified by race and ethnicity: African American, Asian, Native Hawaiian, American Indian, Hispanic, and White. Propensity score matching adjusted for demographic and clinical variables. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to compare the likelihood of undergoing top or bottom surgery at 6 months and 1-year posteligibility. A <i>P</i> value <.05 was considered significant. <b>Results:</b> At 6 months posteligibility, African American patients had significantly lower odds of undergoing top (OR = 0.876, <i>P</i> = .0480) and bottom surgeries (OR = 0.399, <i>P</i> = .0111) compared to White patients. Hispanic patients also had lower odds for top (OR = 0.873, <i>P</i> = 0.0014) and bottom surgeries (OR = 0.872, <i>P</i> = 0.0314). In contrast, Asian patients had higher odds of receiving top (OR = 1.267, <i>P</i> = .0079) and bottom surgeries (OR = 1.333, <i>P</i> = 0.0007). These disparities remained evident at the 1-year mark, with African American and Hispanic patients continuing to experience reduced surgical access relative to White patients. <b>Conclusion:</b> Significant racial and ethnic disparities persist in GAS access. Targeted interventions are needed to promote equitable surgical care for transgender individuals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Plastic Surgery
Published
2025-10-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/22925503251387092
Primary Topic
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Utilization of Top and Bottom Gender Affirming Surgeries Among Eligible Transgender Adults

R. J. Hollis, Joshua E Lewis, Oyetokunbo Ibidapo-Obe, Amy Patterson et al.
Plastic Surgery
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
article

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Utilization of Top and Bottom Gender Affirming Surgeries Among Eligible Transgender Adults

R. J. Hollis, Joshua E Lewis, Oyetokunbo Ibidapo-Obe, Amy Patterson, Calah Burros, Carolyn Henein, Casey Brusen
article en

Abstract

<b>Introduction:</b> Gender-affirming surgery (GAS) is a critical step for many transgender individuals seeking alignment between their physical appearance and gender identity. However, disparities in access to GAS across racial and ethnic groups remain inadequately addressed. This study aims to examine racial and ethnic disparities in access to top and bottom gender-affirming surgeries. <b>Methods:</b> A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted using the TriNetX database (2014-2024). Patients aged 18+ with a diagnosis of gender dysphoria who completed at least 6 months of hormone therapy were included. Patients were identified using ICD-10 and CPT codes and stratified by race and ethnicity: African American, Asian, Native Hawaiian, American Indian, Hispanic, and White. Propensity score matching adjusted for demographic and clinical variables. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to compare the likelihood of undergoing top or bottom surgery at 6 months and 1-year posteligibility. A <i>P</i> value <.05 was considered significant. <b>Results:</b> At 6 months posteligibility, African American patients had significantly lower odds of undergoing top (OR = 0.876, <i>P</i> = .0480) and bottom surgeries (OR = 0.399, <i>P</i> = .0111) compared to White patients. Hispanic patients also had lower odds for top (OR = 0.873, <i>P</i> = 0.0014) and bottom surgeries (OR = 0.872, <i>P</i> = 0.0314). In contrast, Asian patients had higher odds of receiving top (OR = 1.267, <i>P</i> = .0079) and bottom surgeries (OR = 1.333, <i>P</i> = 0.0007). These disparities remained evident at the 1-year mark, with African American and Hispanic patients continuing to experience reduced surgical access relative to White patients. <b>Conclusion:</b> Significant racial and ethnic disparities persist in GAS access. Targeted interventions are needed to promote equitable surgical care for transgender individuals.

Plastic Surgery
Prairie View A&M University (US), Tilganga Institute of Ophthalmology (NP), Houston Fertility Institute (US), University of Houston (US), The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston (US), Texas A&M University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.