Comparison of three strategies (urgent vs. early vs. planned-start) of peritoneal dialysis initiation in kidney failure patients requiring dialysis

IntroductionThe clinical outcomes of starting peritoneal dialysis (PD) in kidney failure patients according to different break-in periods are not well established. Our aim was to assess whether the strategy of PD initiation interferes with clinical outcomes over the initial 180 days.MethodsThis retrospective study included incident kidney failure patients starting PD at a single center (November 2016-July 2022). Patients were divided into three groups: (1) Urgent-start (US-PD), initiated within 3 days after catheter insertion without prior hemodialysis (HD); (2) Early-start (ES-PD), initiated between 3-14 days, including those with ≤30 days of prior HD; (3) Planned-start (Plan-PD), initiated after 15 days without prior HD. Mechanical and infectious complications, hospitalizations, mortality, and time on PD were compared at 180 days. Patient dropout was defined as the discontinuation of PD due to death or transfer to HD.ResultsA total of 211 patients were included: 118 (55.9%) US-PD, 46 (21.9%) ES-PD, and 47 (22.2%) Plan-PD. Among ES-PD patients, 15 (32.6%) had prior HD (<30 days - median time 19 days). Catheter insertion was mostly performed by nephrologists (60.6%) using the modified Seldinger technique (59.2%). Early complications included catheter dysfunction, which occurred in 12.7% of the overall cohort (17.8% in US-PD vs. 4.3% in ES-PD vs. 8.5% in Plan-PD; p = 0.04), and leakage, observed in 7.1% of the overall cohort (9.3% in US-PD vs. 6.5% in ES-PD vs. 2.1% in Plan-PD; p = 0.26). Later complications, hospitalizations, mortality, and time on PD did not differ significantly between groups. Peritonitis, poor education, and hospitalization were associated with dropout.ConclusionAlthough initiating PD within 72 h of catheter insertion was associated with more mechanical complications in our study, it resulted in similar clinical outcomes to Planned-start PD patients within the first 6 months of therapy, making it a viable option for urgent dialysis initiation in kidney failure patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Peritoneal Dialysis International
Published
2025-10-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/08968608251383017
Primary Topic
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of three strategies (urgent vs. early vs. planned-start) of peritoneal dialysis initiation in kidney failure patients requiring dialysis

Camila Tosin, Murilo Pilatti, Viviane Cálice-Silva, Marcelo Mazza do Nascimento et al.
Peritoneal Dialysis International
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
article

Comparison of three strategies (urgent vs. early vs. planned-start) of peritoneal dialysis initiation in kidney failure patients requiring dialysis

Camila Tosin, Murilo Pilatti, Viviane Cálice-Silva, Marcelo Mazza do Nascimento, Giovanna Cyrillo Bagio, Gabriela Sevignani, Milena Veiga Wiggers
article en

Abstract

IntroductionThe clinical outcomes of starting peritoneal dialysis (PD) in kidney failure patients according to different break-in periods are not well established. Our aim was to assess whether the strategy of PD initiation interferes with clinical outcomes over the initial 180 days.MethodsThis retrospective study included incident kidney failure patients starting PD at a single center (November 2016-July 2022). Patients were divided into three groups: (1) Urgent-start (US-PD), initiated within 3 days after catheter insertion without prior hemodialysis (HD); (2) Early-start (ES-PD), initiated between 3-14 days, including those with ≤30 days of prior HD; (3) Planned-start (Plan-PD), initiated after 15 days without prior HD. Mechanical and infectious complications, hospitalizations, mortality, and time on PD were compared at 180 days. Patient dropout was defined as the discontinuation of PD due to death or transfer to HD.ResultsA total of 211 patients were included: 118 (55.9%) US-PD, 46 (21.9%) ES-PD, and 47 (22.2%) Plan-PD. Among ES-PD patients, 15 (32.6%) had prior HD (<30 days - median time 19 days). Catheter insertion was mostly performed by nephrologists (60.6%) using the modified Seldinger technique (59.2%). Early complications included catheter dysfunction, which occurred in 12.7% of the overall cohort (17.8% in US-PD vs. 4.3% in ES-PD vs. 8.5% in Plan-PD; p = 0.04), and leakage, observed in 7.1% of the overall cohort (9.3% in US-PD vs. 6.5% in ES-PD vs. 2.1% in Plan-PD; p = 0.26). Later complications, hospitalizations, mortality, and time on PD did not differ significantly between groups. Peritonitis, poor education, and hospitalization were associated with dropout.ConclusionAlthough initiating PD within 72 h of catheter insertion was associated with more mechanical complications in our study, it resulted in similar clinical outcomes to Planned-start PD patients within the first 6 months of therapy, making it a viable option for urgent dialysis initiation in kidney failure patients.

Peritoneal Dialysis International
Universidade da Região de Joinville (BR), Hospital Municipal São José (BR), Universidade Federal do Paraná (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.