Motives and Self-Reported Propensity for Sexual Offending in Community Men and Women

Motives for online sexual offending have mostly been studied in forensic populations. To gain insights into risks and prevention options, community samples are also relevant. In this exploratory study, an online convenience sample of 2,764 participants <i>(n</i><sub>men</sub> = 1,263; <i>n</i><sub>women</sub> = 1,420) was recruited via social media platforms. Approximately 2%-4% of men and less than 1% of women from this online sample reported some propensity for online or contact sexual behaviors with a child, provided there were no negative personal consequences. Latent class analyses, conducted separately for men and women, identified three different classes based on scores on motivational risk factors, which we labeled "multiple motivations," "social needs," and "mating prowess." In distal outcome analyses, individuals in the "multiple motivations" class (i.e., those with relatively high scores on most of the motivational factors) were most likely to engage in sexual offending against children and adults as well as other atypical or problematic behaviors. The exploratory findings suggest that not only paraphilia, but also social needs (e.g., loneliness, social anxiety) and other sexual domains (e.g., high sex drive) should be included in prevention efforts for sexual offending targeted to the general population.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sexual Abuse
Published
2025-10-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10790632251389173
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.31
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Motives and Self-Reported Propensity for Sexual Offending in Community Men and Women

Kelly M. Babchishin, Robert Lehmann, Rebecca Reichel, Laura Quinten et al.
1 citations
Sexual Abuse
Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
2.31
article

Motives and Self-Reported Propensity for Sexual Offending in Community Men and Women

Kelly M. Babchishin, Robert Lehmann, Rebecca Reichel, Laura Quinten, Alexander F. Schmidt, Frederic M. Gnielka, Colm Gannon, Nina Baumgärtner, Azade A. O. Yegane Orani
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Motives for online sexual offending have mostly been studied in forensic populations. To gain insights into risks and prevention options, community samples are also relevant. In this exploratory study, an online convenience sample of 2,764 participants <i>(n</i><sub>men</sub> = 1,263; <i>n</i><sub>women</sub> = 1,420) was recruited via social media platforms. Approximately 2%-4% of men and less than 1% of women from this online sample reported some propensity for online or contact sexual behaviors with a child, provided there were no negative personal consequences. Latent class analyses, conducted separately for men and women, identified three different classes based on scores on motivational risk factors, which we labeled "multiple motivations," "social needs," and "mating prowess." In distal outcome analyses, individuals in the "multiple motivations" class (i.e., those with relatively high scores on most of the motivational factors) were most likely to engage in sexual offending against children and adults as well as other atypical or problematic behaviors. The exploratory findings suggest that not only paraphilia, but also social needs (e.g., loneliness, social anxiety) and other sexual domains (e.g., high sex drive) should be included in prevention efforts for sexual offending targeted to the general population.

Sexual AbuseVol. 38(2)
La Trobe University (AU), Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE), MSB Medical School Berlin (DE), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE), Carleton University (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
2.31
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.