Big Games, Little Voices: Patriarchy and Power at SEC Football Media Days

Patriarchy in collegiate athletics is perpetuated through structural hierarchies and the pervasive use of patriarchal and paternalistic discourse by authority figures – primarily coaches and administrators. These individuals position themselves as guardians of athlete welfare and decision-making, often employing language that frames their oversight as protective and benevolent. However, such discourse reinforces a structural hierarchy that infantilizes athletes and undermines their autonomy. This research critically examined the ways in which patriarchal and paternalistic language operates within the institutional setting of collegiate athletics. Conducting an analysis of coach and athlete interviews ( n = 446), the study reveals how paternalistic narratives normalize dependency and constrain athletes’ self-determination. The findings highlight the ways that infantilizing rhetoric serves to legitimize hierarchical control and justify the marginalization of athlete voices, particularly in areas of representation, monetization, and the broader commercialization of college sports.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Communication & Sport
Published
2025-10-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/21674795251391153
Primary Topic
Sports, Gender, and Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Big Games, Little Voices: Patriarchy and Power at SEC Football Media Days

Chris Corr, Robert Hoffman
Communication & Sport
Sports, Gender, and Society
article

Big Games, Little Voices: Patriarchy and Power at SEC Football Media Days

Chris Corr, Robert Hoffman
article en

Abstract

Patriarchy in collegiate athletics is perpetuated through structural hierarchies and the pervasive use of patriarchal and paternalistic discourse by authority figures – primarily coaches and administrators. These individuals position themselves as guardians of athlete welfare and decision-making, often employing language that frames their oversight as protective and benevolent. However, such discourse reinforces a structural hierarchy that infantilizes athletes and undermines their autonomy. This research critically examined the ways in which patriarchal and paternalistic language operates within the institutional setting of collegiate athletics. Conducting an analysis of coach and athlete interviews ( n = 446), the study reveals how paternalistic narratives normalize dependency and constrain athletes’ self-determination. The findings highlight the ways that infantilizing rhetoric serves to legitimize hierarchical control and justify the marginalization of athlete voices, particularly in areas of representation, monetization, and the broader commercialization of college sports.

Communication & Sport
Abington Memorial Hospital (US), Clemson University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Sports, Gender, and Society
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Big Games, Little Voices: Patriarchy and Power at SEC Football Media Days — Chris Corr, Robert Hoffman · Communication & Sport (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS