Stock price crash risk and institutional ownership: Evidence from Borsa Istanbul

This paper examines the relationship between institutional ownership and stock price crash risk for non-financial firms listed on Borsa Istanbul from 2005 to 2023. The findings show that greater institutional investor participation increases the risk of future crashes, supporting the short-termism theory rather than monitoring theory. This result aligns with research on emerging markets, such as China and Vietnam, but it contrasts with evidence from developed markets such as the US. The relationship is statistically and economically significant in the traditional framework that covers only investment funds and investment trusts, including local and foreign institutional investors. A fixed-effect model, using the first-difference of overall and local professional institutional ownership, provides robust evidence for short-termism theory: institutional investors heighten crash risk by reducing holdings (i.e., “voting with their feet”). However, this approach does not yield statistically significant results for foreign institutional investors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Borsa Istanbul Review
Published
2025-10-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2025.10.028
Primary Topic
Corporate Finance and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Stock price crash risk and institutional ownership: Evidence from Borsa Istanbul

Mehmet Benturk
Borsa Istanbul Review
Corporate Finance and Governance
article

Stock price crash risk and institutional ownership: Evidence from Borsa Istanbul

Mehmet Benturk
article en

Abstract

This paper examines the relationship between institutional ownership and stock price crash risk for non-financial firms listed on Borsa Istanbul from 2005 to 2023. The findings show that greater institutional investor participation increases the risk of future crashes, supporting the short-termism theory rather than monitoring theory. This result aligns with research on emerging markets, such as China and Vietnam, but it contrasts with evidence from developed markets such as the US. The relationship is statistically and economically significant in the traditional framework that covers only investment funds and investment trusts, including local and foreign institutional investors. A fixed-effect model, using the first-difference of overall and local professional institutional ownership, provides robust evidence for short-termism theory: institutional investors heighten crash risk by reducing holdings (i.e., “voting with their feet”). However, this approach does not yield statistically significant results for foreign institutional investors.

Borsa Istanbul ReviewVol. 26(1)
İstanbul Gelişim Üniversitesi (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Corporate Finance and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.