The inherent fragility of collective proliferative control

Tissues achieve and maintain their sizes through active feedback, whereby cells collectively regulate proliferation and differentiation to facilitate homeostasis and the ability to respond to disturbances. One of the best understood feedback mechanisms-<i>renewal control</i>-achieves remarkable feats of robustness in determining and maintaining desired sizes. Yet in a variety of biologically relevant situations, we show that stochastic effects should cause rare but catastrophic failures of renewal control. We define the circumstances under which this occurs and raise the possibility that such events account for important non-genetic steps in the development of cancer. We further suggest that the spontaneous stochastic reversal of these events could explain cases of cancer normalization or dormancy following treatment. Indeed, we show that the kinetics of post-treatment recurrence for many cancers are often better fit by a model of stochastic re-emergence due to the loss of collective proliferative control than by deterministic models of cancer relapse.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
iScience
Published
2025-10-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2025.113838
Primary Topic
Space exploration and regulation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The inherent fragility of collective proliferative control

Arthur D. Lander, Michael G Caldwell
iScience
Space exploration and regulation
article

The inherent fragility of collective proliferative control

Arthur D. Lander, Michael G Caldwell
article en

Abstract

Tissues achieve and maintain their sizes through active feedback, whereby cells collectively regulate proliferation and differentiation to facilitate homeostasis and the ability to respond to disturbances. One of the best understood feedback mechanisms-<i>renewal control</i>-achieves remarkable feats of robustness in determining and maintaining desired sizes. Yet in a variety of biologically relevant situations, we show that stochastic effects should cause rare but catastrophic failures of renewal control. We define the circumstances under which this occurs and raise the possibility that such events account for important non-genetic steps in the development of cancer. We further suggest that the spontaneous stochastic reversal of these events could explain cases of cancer normalization or dormancy following treatment. Indeed, we show that the kinetics of post-treatment recurrence for many cancers are often better fit by a model of stochastic re-emergence due to the loss of collective proliferative control than by deterministic models of cancer relapse.

iScienceVol. 28(11)
University of California, Irvine (US), Irvine University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Space exploration and regulation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The inherent fragility of collective proliferative control — Arthur D. Lander, Michael G Caldwell · iScience (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS