Quantifying cardiovascular autonomic aging with machine learning

Machine learning has become an important tool in precision medicine and aging research. We introduce the cardiovascular autonomic age (CAA) gap, a novel metric quantifying the deviation between machine learning-estimated biological age and chronological age based on autonomic cardiovascular function. High-resolution electrocardiograms and continuous blood pressure recordings at rest were collected from 1,060 healthy individuals. From these signals, 29 autonomic indices were derived, including time-, frequency-, and symbol-domain heart rate variability, cardiovascular coupling, pulse wave dynamics, and QT interval features. A Gaussian process regression model was trained on 879 participants to estimate biological age, yielding the CAA. The deviation between CAA and chronological age defined the CAA gap, which was evaluated in two test sets stratified by cardiovascular risk (CVR) using the Framingham risk score. At a 0.5% threshold, the high-CVR group showed a markedly increased CAA gap (+11 yr), whereas the low-CVR group demonstrated a slightly negative gap (-1 yr). In the high-risk group, the slope of predicted versus actual age suggested accelerated physiological aging. CAA correlated positively with the Framingham risk score (<i>r</i> = 0.42, <i>P</i> < 0.001), and the CAA gap correlated with deviation from normative risk (<i>r</i> = 0.31, <i>P</i> = 0.002). Across thresholds, elevated CAA in the high-CVR group was consistently observed, with moderate effect sizes ranging from 0.32 to 0.46. These findings suggest that the CAA gap may serve as a sensitive and interpretable indicator of cardiovascular risk and aging, with potential relevance for early detection and longitudinal assessment.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> The cardiovascular autonomic age (CAA) gap is a new machine learning-based marker that reveals when the body ages faster than the clock. Using resting-state cardiovascular recordings from 1,000+ participants, we show that individuals with higher cardiovascular risk exhibit accelerated autonomic aging. The CAA gap could become a sensitive, interpretable tool for early detection and long-term monitoring.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
Published
2025-10-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.00693.2025
Primary Topic
Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantifying cardiovascular autonomic aging with machine learning

Denis Gerstorf, Yubraj Gupta, Maria Geisler, Andy Schumann et al.
American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
article

Quantifying cardiovascular autonomic aging with machine learning

Denis Gerstorf, Yubraj Gupta, Maria Geisler, Andy Schumann, Maja Olecka, Feliberto de la Cruz, Ilja Demuth, Christian Gaser, Karl‐Juergen Bär
article en

Abstract

Machine learning has become an important tool in precision medicine and aging research. We introduce the cardiovascular autonomic age (CAA) gap, a novel metric quantifying the deviation between machine learning-estimated biological age and chronological age based on autonomic cardiovascular function. High-resolution electrocardiograms and continuous blood pressure recordings at rest were collected from 1,060 healthy individuals. From these signals, 29 autonomic indices were derived, including time-, frequency-, and symbol-domain heart rate variability, cardiovascular coupling, pulse wave dynamics, and QT interval features. A Gaussian process regression model was trained on 879 participants to estimate biological age, yielding the CAA. The deviation between CAA and chronological age defined the CAA gap, which was evaluated in two test sets stratified by cardiovascular risk (CVR) using the Framingham risk score. At a 0.5% threshold, the high-CVR group showed a markedly increased CAA gap (+11 yr), whereas the low-CVR group demonstrated a slightly negative gap (-1 yr). In the high-risk group, the slope of predicted versus actual age suggested accelerated physiological aging. CAA correlated positively with the Framingham risk score (<i>r</i> = 0.42, <i>P</i> < 0.001), and the CAA gap correlated with deviation from normative risk (<i>r</i> = 0.31, <i>P</i> = 0.002). Across thresholds, elevated CAA in the high-CVR group was consistently observed, with moderate effect sizes ranging from 0.32 to 0.46. These findings suggest that the CAA gap may serve as a sensitive and interpretable indicator of cardiovascular risk and aging, with potential relevance for early detection and longitudinal assessment.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> The cardiovascular autonomic age (CAA) gap is a new machine learning-based marker that reveals when the body ages faster than the clock. Using resting-state cardiovascular recordings from 1,000+ participants, we show that individuals with higher cardiovascular risk exhibit accelerated autonomic aging. The CAA gap could become a sensitive, interpretable tool for early detection and long-term monitoring.

American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory PhysiologyVol. 329(6)
Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE), Leibniz Institute on Aging - Fritz Lipmann Institute (FLI) (DE), Jena University Hospital (DE), Freie Universität Berlin (DE), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.