Linking cognitive performance and age prediction with psychological distress in youth

Adolescence is a crucial period for the refinement of cognitive functions. During this time, reduced cognitive functioning is often associated with psychological distress. Deviations in cognitive maturation can serve as potential indicators of future psychological challenges. We examined cross-sectional relationships between cognitive performance and self-reported psychological distress among children, adolescents and young adults. We also explored the association between psychological distress and cognitive domain scores. Participants ( n = 699, 9–25 years, 73 % females) completed computerised cognitive tests and questionnaires assessing emotional symptoms, anxiety, depression, peer problems, hyperactivity and conduct problems. Using machine learning, we estimated participants' cognitive age, deriving a cognitive age gap (CAG). General additive models (GAMs) assessed associations between age-corrected CAG (cCAG) and symptoms, adjusting for sex, age, and multiple comparisons. Next, we evaluated the link between psychological distress and motor speed, attention span, working memory, executive control of attention, episodic memory and mental and visuo-motor speed. The cognitive age predictor showed moderate accuracy ( r = 0.55, R 2 = 0.30, RMSE = 2.56, MAE = 2.01). Linear models revealed no significant associations between cCAG and psychological distress after multiple comparisons correction. Cognitive domain analysis revealed significant associations between motor speed, emotional symptoms and hyperactivity; attention span and conduct problems; both working memory and episodic memory and anxiety, hyperactivity and conduct problems; mental and visuo-motor speed and hyperactivity and conduct problems. Cognitive age prediction is feasible in youth. While psychological distress was not significantly associated with CAG, several associations with cognitive domain scores were identified, suggesting varying sensitivity to psychological distress across domains. • One of few studies leveraging age prediction framework on cognitive test scores. • Machine learning applied on cognitive tests to estimate participants'cognitive age. • Cognitive age gap as an estimate of deviant cognitive performance in youth. • Psychological distress was not significantly associated with cognitive age gap. • Psychological distress associated with poorer performance in some cognitive domains.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Acta Psychologica
Published
2025-10-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105795
Primary Topic
Mental Health Research Topics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Linking cognitive performance and age prediction with psychological distress in youth

Lars Tjelta Westlye, Rikka Kjelkenes, Irene Voldsbekk, Esten H. Leonardsen et al.
Acta Psychologica
Mental Health Research Topics
article

Linking cognitive performance and age prediction with psychological distress in youth

Lars Tjelta Westlye, Rikka Kjelkenes, Irene Voldsbekk, Esten H. Leonardsen, Victoria Moskal, Linn Charlotte Figenschou Holthe
article en

Abstract

Adolescence is a crucial period for the refinement of cognitive functions. During this time, reduced cognitive functioning is often associated with psychological distress. Deviations in cognitive maturation can serve as potential indicators of future psychological challenges. We examined cross-sectional relationships between cognitive performance and self-reported psychological distress among children, adolescents and young adults. We also explored the association between psychological distress and cognitive domain scores. Participants ( n = 699, 9–25 years, 73 % females) completed computerised cognitive tests and questionnaires assessing emotional symptoms, anxiety, depression, peer problems, hyperactivity and conduct problems. Using machine learning, we estimated participants' cognitive age, deriving a cognitive age gap (CAG). General additive models (GAMs) assessed associations between age-corrected CAG (cCAG) and symptoms, adjusting for sex, age, and multiple comparisons. Next, we evaluated the link between psychological distress and motor speed, attention span, working memory, executive control of attention, episodic memory and mental and visuo-motor speed. The cognitive age predictor showed moderate accuracy ( r = 0.55, R 2 = 0.30, RMSE = 2.56, MAE = 2.01). Linear models revealed no significant associations between cCAG and psychological distress after multiple comparisons correction. Cognitive domain analysis revealed significant associations between motor speed, emotional symptoms and hyperactivity; attention span and conduct problems; both working memory and episodic memory and anxiety, hyperactivity and conduct problems; mental and visuo-motor speed and hyperactivity and conduct problems. Cognitive age prediction is feasible in youth. While psychological distress was not significantly associated with CAG, several associations with cognitive domain scores were identified, suggesting varying sensitivity to psychological distress across domains. • One of few studies leveraging age prediction framework on cognitive test scores. • Machine learning applied on cognitive tests to estimate participants'cognitive age. • Cognitive age gap as an estimate of deviant cognitive performance in youth. • Psychological distress was not significantly associated with cognitive age gap. • Psychological distress associated with poorer performance in some cognitive domains.

Acta PsychologicaVol. 261
Oslo University Hospital (NO), University of Oslo (NO), Diakonhjemmet Hospital (NO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Mental Health Research Topics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.