Phase-Resolved Shear Stress and Sediment Flux Profiles in a Combined Wave-Current Bottom Boundary Layer

Phase-resolved profiles of shear stress and turbulent sediment flux were collected in the wave bottom boundary layer of South San Francisco Bay. Observations revealed a transitional boundary layer influenced by benthic roughness, matching the phase variability of classic laboratory experiments but deviating in vertical structure. Wave friction factor measurements were evaluated against various parameterizations, finding that the Nielsen (1992) and Rogers et al. (2016) formulations were most accurate. The Grant and Madsen (1979) combined wave-current shear stress model accurately predicted the total bed shear stress, though negative bias increased with wave strength. The phase relationship between free stream velocity and bed shear stress was, on average, close to that predicted by theory, though phase behavior was possibly contaminated by measurement noise during weaker wave conditions. Finally, turbulent sediment fluxes exhibited complex vertical structure, with divergent behavior within and above the benthic canopy. These results provide important validation for popular bottom boundary layer models, while highlighting the complexities of cohesive sediment erosion over rough beds and in combined wave-current forcing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ARC Geophysical Research
Published
2025-10-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5149/arc-gr.1704
Primary Topic
Library Science and Information Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Phase-Resolved Shear Stress and Sediment Flux Profiles in a Combined Wave-Current Bottom Boundary Layer

Galen Egan
ARC Geophysical Research
Library Science and Information Systems
article

Phase-Resolved Shear Stress and Sediment Flux Profiles in a Combined Wave-Current Bottom Boundary Layer

Galen Egan
article en

Abstract

Phase-resolved profiles of shear stress and turbulent sediment flux were collected in the wave bottom boundary layer of South San Francisco Bay. Observations revealed a transitional boundary layer influenced by benthic roughness, matching the phase variability of classic laboratory experiments but deviating in vertical structure. Wave friction factor measurements were evaluated against various parameterizations, finding that the Nielsen (1992) and Rogers et al. (2016) formulations were most accurate. The Grant and Madsen (1979) combined wave-current shear stress model accurately predicted the total bed shear stress, though negative bias increased with wave strength. The phase relationship between free stream velocity and bed shear stress was, on average, close to that predicted by theory, though phase behavior was possibly contaminated by measurement noise during weaker wave conditions. Finally, turbulent sediment fluxes exhibited complex vertical structure, with divergent behavior within and above the benthic canopy. These results provide important validation for popular bottom boundary layer models, while highlighting the complexities of cohesive sediment erosion over rough beds and in combined wave-current forcing.

ARC Geophysical Research
Princeton University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Library Science and Information Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Phase-Resolved Shear Stress and Sediment Flux Profiles in a Combined Wave-Current Bottom Boundary Layer — Galen Egan · ARC Geophysical Research (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS