Self-rated health and score on the item “caring about what goes on” on the sense of coherence scale as prospective predictors for all-cause mortality

Self-rated health and score on the item "caring about what goes on" from the Sense of Coherence scale were examined as predictors of all-cause mortality. Higher values on both measures (better health and caring more) predicted lower mortality among 2297 middle-aged men followed for 39 years. Fully adjusted hazard ratios (95 % confidence interval; p-value) were 0.86 (0.80-0.92; <0.001) for self-rated health and 0.96 (0.93-0.99; 0.009) for caring. However, neither substantially improved the discriminatory power of conventional mortality predictors. Nevertheless, they may serve as age-adjusted predictors of mortality, particularly when clinical data are limited or when a comprehensive well-being assessment is desired.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Maturitas
Published
2025-10-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.maturitas.2025.108761
Primary Topic
Health, psychology, and well-being
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Self-rated health and score on the item “caring about what goes on” on the sense of coherence scale as prospective predictors for all-cause mortality

Ari Voutilainen, Ilkka Piiroinen
Maturitas
Health, psychology, and well-being
article

Self-rated health and score on the item “caring about what goes on” on the sense of coherence scale as prospective predictors for all-cause mortality

Ari Voutilainen, Ilkka Piiroinen
article en

Abstract

Self-rated health and score on the item "caring about what goes on" from the Sense of Coherence scale were examined as predictors of all-cause mortality. Higher values on both measures (better health and caring more) predicted lower mortality among 2297 middle-aged men followed for 39 years. Fully adjusted hazard ratios (95 % confidence interval; p-value) were 0.86 (0.80-0.92; <0.001) for self-rated health and 0.96 (0.93-0.99; 0.009) for caring. However, neither substantially improved the discriminatory power of conventional mortality predictors. Nevertheless, they may serve as age-adjusted predictors of mortality, particularly when clinical data are limited or when a comprehensive well-being assessment is desired.

MaturitasVol. 203
University of Eastern Finland (FI), Tampere University (FI)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Health, psychology, and well-being
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.