Real-World Usage, Emissions, and Costs of Hydrogen Fuel Cell Electric Truck Fleets

Hydrogen fuel cell electric trucks (FCETs) have been seen as an important decarbonization pathway for heavy-duty trucks, but their real-world operational performance and costs remain uncertain, posing challenges to the widespread adoption. This study presents the largest analysis to date of real-world operational data from 106 heavy-duty FCETs across six application scenarios in China. We examine usage patterns, energy consumption, life-cycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and total cost of ownership (TCO). FCETs are deployed across diverse application scenarios, with most operating on short- to medium-distance routes (average daily mileage <300 km), and some utilizing both hydrogen refueling and grid charging. In Beijing, where hydrogen is primarily sourced from industrial byproducts, FCETs generally exhibit lower life-cycle GHG emissions than diesel and battery-electric trucks, except in low-utilization scenarios. Currently, the unsubsidized TCO of FCETs is 42-152% higher than that of diesel trucks (DTs). However, with purchase, operational, and hydrogen subsidies, the TCO can be 13-36% lower than that of DTs. While FCETs offer strong carbon reduction potential, achieving TCO parity requires alignment with appropriate application scenarios and adequate refueling infrastructure, particularly for long-haul operations by 2030.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Science & Technology
Published
2025-10-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5c09349
Primary Topic
Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Real-World Usage, Emissions, and Costs of Hydrogen Fuel Cell Electric Truck Fleets

Hao Lin, Limiao Zhang, Ye Wu, Shaojun Zhang et al.
Environmental Science & Technology
Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
article

Real-World Usage, Emissions, and Costs of Hydrogen Fuel Cell Electric Truck Fleets

Hao Lin, Limiao Zhang, Ye Wu, Shaojun Zhang, Pei Zhao, Yiling Xiong, Jiming Hao, Weinan He, Fang Wang
article en

Abstract

Hydrogen fuel cell electric trucks (FCETs) have been seen as an important decarbonization pathway for heavy-duty trucks, but their real-world operational performance and costs remain uncertain, posing challenges to the widespread adoption. This study presents the largest analysis to date of real-world operational data from 106 heavy-duty FCETs across six application scenarios in China. We examine usage patterns, energy consumption, life-cycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and total cost of ownership (TCO). FCETs are deployed across diverse application scenarios, with most operating on short- to medium-distance routes (average daily mileage <300 km), and some utilizing both hydrogen refueling and grid charging. In Beijing, where hydrogen is primarily sourced from industrial byproducts, FCETs generally exhibit lower life-cycle GHG emissions than diesel and battery-electric trucks, except in low-utilization scenarios. Currently, the unsubsidized TCO of FCETs is 42-152% higher than that of diesel trucks (DTs). However, with purchase, operational, and hydrogen subsidies, the TCO can be 13-36% lower than that of DTs. While FCETs offer strong carbon reduction potential, achieving TCO parity requires alignment with appropriate application scenarios and adequate refueling infrastructure, particularly for long-haul operations by 2030.

Environmental Science & TechnologyVol. 59(46)
Ministry of Ecology and Environment (CN), Sehenstar Energy Technology (China) (CN), Sustainability Institute (ZA), Next Energy Technologies (United States) (US), Frontier Environmental Technology (United States) (US), Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US), Tsinghua University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.