Elevated participation in co-management increases the willingness of stalked barnacle harvesters to adopt highly restrictive and spatially explicit management strategies

Ensuring the sustainability of European stalked barnacle fisheries requires effective management strategies. Insights into the experience of resource users with different management strategies can help to assess their success. To explore the opinion of the harvesters on the management of local fisheries, we conducted a multi-regional survey in Spain, Portugal and France with varying degrees of co-management. We analysed their responses using a multinomial logistic regression to understand what drove the observed differences. No single optimal strategy to achieve sustainability emerged, and the analysis revealed that geographic region was the most significant variable explaining the preferences of harvester. In less developed co-management systems they favored general input and output restrictions and expressed a desire for greater involvement in co-management processes. Conversely, in highly developed co-management systems with Territorial User Rights for Fishers (TURFs) they preferred the most restrictive and spatially explicit management strategies, such as implementing harvest bans and establishing marine reserves. These preferences indicate that harvesters in TURF-based systems exhibit a high level of stewardship and commitment to sustainable resource management. Moreover, our results indicate that the majority of harvesters in the regions in Portugal and France, areas with less developed co-management, are willing to make changes to current management strategies, reflecting their awareness of the need for improvement. To enhance the development of sustainable management practices across the distributional range of fishery resources, management strategies do not only need to be tailored to each region's particular practices, needs, and characteristics, but also consider the readiness of resource users for specific strategies. • Comparing perceptions of stalked barnacle harvesters from six European regions. • Harvesters in less participatory fisheries show higher willingness to change strategies. • Advanced co-management systems promote restrictive & spatially explicit strategies. • Harvesters readiness for strategies is crucial for sustainable fisheries management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Fisheries Research
Published
2025-10-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2025.107566
Primary Topic
Marine and coastal plant biology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Elevated participation in co-management increases the willingness of stalked barnacle harvesters to adopt highly restrictive and spatially explicit management strategies

Frederico Monteiro Neves, Antonella Rivera, Susana Fandiño, Gonzalo Macho et al.
Fisheries Research
Marine and coastal plant biology
article

Elevated participation in co-management increases the willingness of stalked barnacle harvesters to adopt highly restrictive and spatially explicit management strategies

Frederico Monteiro Neves, Antonella Rivera, Susana Fandiño, Gonzalo Macho, Matthieu Barbier, Nélia Penteado, José Luis Acuña, Elsa Vázquez, Teresa Cruz, Alba Aguión, Lucía García‐Flórez, Paloma Peón, Éric Thiébaut, Katja Geiger
article en

Abstract

Ensuring the sustainability of European stalked barnacle fisheries requires effective management strategies. Insights into the experience of resource users with different management strategies can help to assess their success. To explore the opinion of the harvesters on the management of local fisheries, we conducted a multi-regional survey in Spain, Portugal and France with varying degrees of co-management. We analysed their responses using a multinomial logistic regression to understand what drove the observed differences. No single optimal strategy to achieve sustainability emerged, and the analysis revealed that geographic region was the most significant variable explaining the preferences of harvester. In less developed co-management systems they favored general input and output restrictions and expressed a desire for greater involvement in co-management processes. Conversely, in highly developed co-management systems with Territorial User Rights for Fishers (TURFs) they preferred the most restrictive and spatially explicit management strategies, such as implementing harvest bans and establishing marine reserves. These preferences indicate that harvesters in TURF-based systems exhibit a high level of stewardship and commitment to sustainable resource management. Moreover, our results indicate that the majority of harvesters in the regions in Portugal and France, areas with less developed co-management, are willing to make changes to current management strategies, reflecting their awareness of the need for improvement. To enhance the development of sustainable management practices across the distributional range of fishery resources, management strategies do not only need to be tailored to each region's particular practices, needs, and characteristics, but also consider the readiness of resource users for specific strategies. • Comparing perceptions of stalked barnacle harvesters from six European regions. • Harvesters in less participatory fisheries show higher willingness to change strategies. • Advanced co-management systems promote restrictive & spatially explicit strategies. • Harvesters readiness for strategies is crucial for sustainable fisheries management.

Fisheries ResearchVol. 292
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Universidad de Oviedo (ES), University of Évora (PT), Xunta de Galicia (ES), Coral Reef Alliance (US), Gobierno del Principado de Asturias (ES), Station Biologique de Roscoff (FR), Regional Maritime University (GH), Sorbonne Université (FR), Fundación Centro Tecnológico de la Información y la Comunicación (ES), Adaptation et Diversité en Milieu Marin (FR), St Nicholas Hospital (GB), Universidade de Vigo (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Marine and coastal plant biology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.