Intended vs. Actual Access to Care: Impact of Healthcare Consolidation on Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes
Hospital and clinic realignments created under the ACA appear to have worsened the healthcare of women and children in the USA, particularly for patients of color. Healthcare status and access to services are highly correlated. States allocating more resources for healthcare have better outcomes. Monopoly exemptions under ACA are temporally and statistically correlated with worsening of maternal outcomes across all geographic regions where control and consolidation was permitted or encouraged. Maternity care deserts have significantly disadvantaged women of color and working-class families in rural and urban zones. Further exacerbating the problem is the reduction of physician independence both within and outside of hospital systems.
Authors
- Mark I. Evans (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1705-799X)
- Lawrence D. Devoe (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1026-8388)
- David W. Britt (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9753-6404)
- Gregory F Ryan
- Myriam Mondestin‐Sorrentino
- Jaqueline Worth
- George M. Mussalli
- Christian Macedonia
Institutions
- National University of Singapore (SG)
- Augusta University (US)
- University of Michigan (US)
- Mount Sinai Hospital (US)
- Perinatal Institute (GB)
- Lancaster City Council (GB)
- Fetal Medicine Foundation of America (US)
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy
- Published
- 2025-10-23
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1159/000549187
- Citations
- 3
- Primary Topic
- Healthcare Policy and Management
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 9.39