Efficacy of Granulocyte Transfusions in Treating Neutropenic Infections: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Intervention Studies

The therapeutic value of granulocyte transfusions (GTX) remains debated. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of intervention studies evaluating GTX efficacy in treating neutropenic infections. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central were searched from inception to March 2025 to identify interventional studies evaluating the efficacy of GTX for neutropenic infections. Studies were qualitatively summarized. Summary risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated for randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and non-randomized controlled trials (NRCTs) using random-effects models. Certainty of evidence was evaluated using GRADE. There were 110 studies meeting inclusion criteria: 16 RCTs, 14 NRCTs, and 80 uncontrolled trials. The most frequent underlying disease was leukemia, and the most frequently reported pathogen was Candida. In RCTs, GTX showed no significant all-cause mortality reduction over standard-of-care in pediatric/adult patients or neonates, both associations with low certainty of evidence. In contrast, prospective NRCTs including pediatric/adult patients showed that GTX led to lower all-cause mortality (RR 0.40; 95% CI: 0.23-0.68, I<sup>2</sup>: 64%), particularly among recipients of high-dose GTX (≥1 × 10<sup>10</sup>cells/transfusion), with very low-certainty evidence. Results support a dose-response relationship and highlight heterogeneity in patients, treatment settings, and infections. This work recommends carefully designed future RCTs, including strict patient stratification.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transfusion Medicine Reviews
Published
2025-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmrv.2025.150929
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Neutropenia and Cancer Infections
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.05
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Efficacy of Granulocyte Transfusions in Treating Neutropenic Infections: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Intervention Studies

Anna‐Maria Lampousi, Marion E. G. Brunck, Alejandra López-Arredondo, Sebastian Leon
1 citations
Transfusion Medicine Reviews
Neutropenia and Cancer Infections
1.05
article

Efficacy of Granulocyte Transfusions in Treating Neutropenic Infections: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Intervention Studies

Anna‐Maria Lampousi, Marion E. G. Brunck, Alejandra López-Arredondo, Sebastian Leon
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The therapeutic value of granulocyte transfusions (GTX) remains debated. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of intervention studies evaluating GTX efficacy in treating neutropenic infections. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central were searched from inception to March 2025 to identify interventional studies evaluating the efficacy of GTX for neutropenic infections. Studies were qualitatively summarized. Summary risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated for randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and non-randomized controlled trials (NRCTs) using random-effects models. Certainty of evidence was evaluated using GRADE. There were 110 studies meeting inclusion criteria: 16 RCTs, 14 NRCTs, and 80 uncontrolled trials. The most frequent underlying disease was leukemia, and the most frequently reported pathogen was Candida. In RCTs, GTX showed no significant all-cause mortality reduction over standard-of-care in pediatric/adult patients or neonates, both associations with low certainty of evidence. In contrast, prospective NRCTs including pediatric/adult patients showed that GTX led to lower all-cause mortality (RR 0.40; 95% CI: 0.23-0.68, I<sup>2</sup>: 64%), particularly among recipients of high-dose GTX (≥1 × 10<sup>10</sup>cells/transfusion), with very low-certainty evidence. Results support a dose-response relationship and highlight heterogeneity in patients, treatment settings, and infections. This work recommends carefully designed future RCTs, including strict patient stratification.

Transfusion Medicine ReviewsVol. 39(4)
Karolinska Institutet (SE), Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (MX), Tecnológico de Monterrey (MX)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Neutropenia and Cancer Infections
1.05
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.