Navigating Eco‐Social Policymaking: Trends, Drivers, and Barriers. Introduction to the Special Issue

ABSTRACT In recent years, research on the integration between social and ecological policies has significantly expanded, highlighting the multiple ways in which these two domains interact. Concepts such as “just transition” and “sustainable welfare” have gained prominence as normative frameworks capturing these interconnections. However, despite the increasing scholarly attention, several important theoretical, conceptual, and empirical gaps remain, particularly regarding how social and ecological spheres intersect across different political systems. This Special Issue contributes to this debate by exploring the complex policymaking dynamics underlying eco‐social policies. Before presenting the contributions, this introductory article provides a thorough review of existing studies on eco‐social policies. The review serves a dual purpose: first, it synthesizes existing knowledge, identifying key gaps; second, it allows us to develop a comprehensive framework to understand eco‐social policymaking, based on a political system or systemic approach. This framework conceptualizes eco‐social policies as the output of a process driven by escalating eco‐social risks and concerns. Citizens' attitudes and voting behavior regarding social and environmental policies serve as the initial inputs that shape policy outputs. Within this system, eco‐ and welfare regimes represent the broader institutional contexts in which political parties and organized interest groups compete to find solutions to eco‐social conflicts and eventually supply eco‐social policies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Regulation & Governance
Published
2025-10-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.70048
Primary Topic
Social Policy and Reform Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Navigating Eco‐Social Policymaking: Trends, Drivers, and Barriers. Introduction to the Special Issue

Matteo Mandelli, Paolo Graziano, Ekaterina Domorenok, Katharina Zimmermann
Regulation & Governance
Social Policy and Reform Studies
article

Navigating Eco‐Social Policymaking: Trends, Drivers, and Barriers. Introduction to the Special Issue

Matteo Mandelli, Paolo Graziano, Ekaterina Domorenok, Katharina Zimmermann
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT In recent years, research on the integration between social and ecological policies has significantly expanded, highlighting the multiple ways in which these two domains interact. Concepts such as “just transition” and “sustainable welfare” have gained prominence as normative frameworks capturing these interconnections. However, despite the increasing scholarly attention, several important theoretical, conceptual, and empirical gaps remain, particularly regarding how social and ecological spheres intersect across different political systems. This Special Issue contributes to this debate by exploring the complex policymaking dynamics underlying eco‐social policies. Before presenting the contributions, this introductory article provides a thorough review of existing studies on eco‐social policies. The review serves a dual purpose: first, it synthesizes existing knowledge, identifying key gaps; second, it allows us to develop a comprehensive framework to understand eco‐social policymaking, based on a political system or systemic approach. This framework conceptualizes eco‐social policies as the output of a process driven by escalating eco‐social risks and concerns. Citizens' attitudes and voting behavior regarding social and environmental policies serve as the initial inputs that shape policy outputs. Within this system, eco‐ and welfare regimes represent the broader institutional contexts in which political parties and organized interest groups compete to find solutions to eco‐social conflicts and eventually supply eco‐social policies.

Regulation & Governance
University of Padua (IT), Universität Hamburg (DE), Centre d'études Européennes de Sciences Po (FR), Hamburg University of Technology (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Social Policy and Reform Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.