Weaving knowledges to support wildlife health surveillance in Kenya's pastoral rangelands

In wildlife-livestock-human interfaces, pathogens capable of spreading between wild and domestic animals and humans have important implications for conservation outcomes, economics, and public health. Robust wildlife health surveillance can help address these risks. However, capacity and resource constraints hinder effective wildlife health surveillance at regional and national scales, particularly in lower- and middle-income countries. We examined how collaboration between Indigenous Peoples and local communities (IPLCs) and wildlife health professionals may support the identification and mitigation of animal and zoonotic disease risks in remote and rural areas where wildlife surveillance remains underresourced. In the pastoral rangelands of Laikipia, Kenya, we completed interviews, focus group discussions, and elicitation methods from April 2023 to May 2024 to determine how Maasai pastoralists (n = 57) and trained animal health professionals (n = 10) understood wildlife health. Pastoralists held extensive place-based knowledge of wildlife health and disease, including knowledge of clinical symptoms, species affected, transmission routes, and trends that complemented, deepened, and extended the same knowledge held by trained animal health professionals. Our results suggest that combining IPLCs' and animal health professionals' knowledge can benefit wildlife health surveillance by enhancing surveillance efforts, furthering mutual learning about emerging or reemerging disease, providing new understanding of disease dynamics, and, more broadly, decolonizing conservation knowledge. Two practical ways IPLCs' knowledge could be included and availed to strengthen wildlife health surveillance and research include use of community-led wildlife health surveillance and research and incorporation of ethnoveterinary training in formal wildlife veterinary curricula. However, precautions must be taken to ensure equitable distribution of benefits arising from knowledge sharing and to safeguard against the appropriation of knowledge associated with animal health and disease.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Conservation Biology
Published
2025-10-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.70162
Primary Topic
Zoonotic diseases and public health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Weaving knowledges to support wildlife health surveillance in Kenya's pastoral rangelands

Brock Bersaglio, Charis Enns, Susanne Shultz, Ramson Karmushu et al.
Conservation Biology
Zoonotic diseases and public health
article

Weaving knowledges to support wildlife health surveillance in Kenya's pastoral rangelands

Brock Bersaglio, Charis Enns, Susanne Shultz, Ramson Karmushu, Nashipai Karinten
article en

Abstract

In wildlife-livestock-human interfaces, pathogens capable of spreading between wild and domestic animals and humans have important implications for conservation outcomes, economics, and public health. Robust wildlife health surveillance can help address these risks. However, capacity and resource constraints hinder effective wildlife health surveillance at regional and national scales, particularly in lower- and middle-income countries. We examined how collaboration between Indigenous Peoples and local communities (IPLCs) and wildlife health professionals may support the identification and mitigation of animal and zoonotic disease risks in remote and rural areas where wildlife surveillance remains underresourced. In the pastoral rangelands of Laikipia, Kenya, we completed interviews, focus group discussions, and elicitation methods from April 2023 to May 2024 to determine how Maasai pastoralists (n = 57) and trained animal health professionals (n = 10) understood wildlife health. Pastoralists held extensive place-based knowledge of wildlife health and disease, including knowledge of clinical symptoms, species affected, transmission routes, and trends that complemented, deepened, and extended the same knowledge held by trained animal health professionals. Our results suggest that combining IPLCs' and animal health professionals' knowledge can benefit wildlife health surveillance by enhancing surveillance efforts, furthering mutual learning about emerging or reemerging disease, providing new understanding of disease dynamics, and, more broadly, decolonizing conservation knowledge. Two practical ways IPLCs' knowledge could be included and availed to strengthen wildlife health surveillance and research include use of community-led wildlife health surveillance and research and incorporation of ethnoveterinary training in formal wildlife veterinary curricula. However, precautions must be taken to ensure equitable distribution of benefits arising from knowledge sharing and to safeguard against the appropriation of knowledge associated with animal health and disease.

Conservation BiologyVol. 40(1)
University of Manchester (GB), Social Action (NG), University of Birmingham (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Zoonotic diseases and public health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.